Purpose: This study compared the efficacy and acceptability of a ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray (DS) versus traditional drops administered by syringe (DD) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery.
Patients And Methods: Eighty-six preschool children were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Children were randomly assigned to receive either DS or DD. For children weighing between 10.5 and 18.5 kg, a dexmedetomidine dosage of 30 μg (two sprays) was administered, while those weighing between 18.5 and 25.5 kg received 45 μg (three sprays). In the DD group, dexmedetomidine was administered at a dose of 2 μg/kg based on body weight. The primary outcome was the proportion of children achieving a Ramsay sedation scale (RSS) score of ≥3 within 30 min. Secondary outcomes included acceptance of intranasal medication, anxiety at parental separation and prior to induction, and compliance with induction.
Results: A total of 83 cases were analyzed. The proportion of children achieving an RSS score of ≥3 within 30 min was similar between the DS and DD groups (90.7% vs. 77.5%, respectively). However, the acceptance score was significantly better in the DS group (mean difference [95%]: -0.9 [-1.267 to -0.5325], P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of successful child-parent separation (88.4% vs. 85%) or satisfactory anxiolytic effect prior to induction (95.3% vs. 92.5%). Compliance with induction was comparable, with 53.5% in the DS group and 40.0% in the DD group demonstrating "optimal" compliance.
Conclusion: Both intranasal spray and syringe drop methods were highly effective in providing sedation and anxiolysis, but the ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray was more acceptable to children, offering a viable alternative to the syringe method.
Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2400089374.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799867 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1528612 | DOI Listing |
Front Pharmacol
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Background: Dexmedetomidine effectively prevents emergence delirium in children. However, intravenous dexmedetomidine is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability and delayed recovery. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a method of reducing these side effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent Anesth Pain Med
February 2025
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Dental fear and anxiety management in children is considered one of the biggest challenges in pediatric dentistry. Intranasal sedation is a promising technique for managing unco-operative pediatric patients with rapid onset, ease of administration, and minimal invasiveness. We aimed to review the efficacy, onset time, duration, and behavioral success of intranasal sedation agents in pediatric dental procedures and identify the most effective regimens for clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Anesthesiol
February 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Hainan branch, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Sanya, China.
Objective: We compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine (DEX) and DEX-esketamine sedation on pediatric acceptance of face mask.
Methods: This single-center double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted at a tertiary hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Ninety children aged 1 year to 6 years old and scheduled for elective surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into receiving DEX alone (n = 45) and DEX-esketamine (n = 45).
Front Pharmacol
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Ministry of Education, Wenzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Purpose: This study compared the efficacy and acceptability of a ready-to-use intranasal dexmedetomidine spray (DS) versus traditional drops administered by syringe (DD) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery.
Patients And Methods: Eighty-six preschool children were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Children were randomly assigned to receive either DS or DD.
Cureus
January 2025
Anesthesia and Critical Care, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Background Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (L&I) and the fixation of skull-pin head-holders are associated with various sympathetic stimuli leading to hemodynamic changes. These changes may lead to myocardial ischemia, brain edema, an increase in intracranial pressure, or intracranial hemorrhage. Many drugs have been used in different combinations to attenuate the sympathetic responses to L&I and skull-pin insertion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!