The consent process for research studies can be burdensome for potential participants due to complex information and lengthy consent forms. This pragmatic study aimed to improve the consent experience and evaluate its impact on participant decision making, study knowledge, and satisfaction with the In Our DNA SC program, a population-based genomic screening initiative. We compared two consent procedures: standard consent (SC) involving a PDF document and enhanced consent (EC) incorporating a pictograph and true or false questions. Decision-making control, study knowledge, satisfaction, and time to consent were assessed. We analyzed data for 109 individuals who completed the SC and 96 who completed the EC. Results indicated strong decision-making control and high levels of knowledge and satisfaction in both groups. While no significant differences were found between the two groups, the EC experience took longer for participants to complete. Future modifications include incorporating video modules and launching a Spanish version of the consent experience. Overall, this study contributes to the growing literature on consent improvements and highlights the need to assess salient components and explore participant preferences for receiving consent information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795863PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.640DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consent experience
12
knowledge satisfaction
12
consent
11
study knowledge
8
decision-making control
8
technology increase
4
increase reach
4
reach optimize
4
optimize consent
4
experience
4

Similar Publications

Objective: To assess whether patient experience is better for patients followed in a primary care team (PCT) than for patients with traditional follow-up in usual care.

Design: A cross-sectional survey based on a self-administered questionnaire.

Setting: Pays de la Loire geographical area (located on the French west coast).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives:  This study aims to explore the beliefs and attitudes related to the adoption of teledentistry among Pakistani dental professionals, focusing on data security, practice enhancement, and patient benefits.

Material And Methods:  A cross-sectional study on a 5-point Likert scale assessed four domains of teledentistry: data security and patient consent, practice improvement capabilities, usefulness for dental practice, and patient benefits, among dental professionals through electronic forms. Demographic data and items from four domains were analyzed by descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation tests, respectively, using SPSS, with a -value of < 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving Consent in Trauma: Recall (ICIT: Recall) : a multicentre study protocol of consent for hip fractures.

Bone Jt Open

March 2025

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Aims: This study investigates the effectiveness and adequacy of the informed consent process for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. While informed consent is a legal and ethical responsibility, factors in the trauma setting can impair patients' understanding and retention of information. This study seeks to evaluate patients' recall of perioperative complications and explore their perceptions of the consent process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Screening for cognitive impairment in primary care is important, yet primary care physicians (PCPs) report conducting routine cognitive assessments for less than half of patients older than 60 years of age. Linus Health's Core Cognitive Evaluation (CCE), a tablet-based digital cognitive assessment, has been used for the detection of cognitive impairment, but its application in primary care is not yet studied.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the integration of CCE implementation in a primary care setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessment of Fraud Deterrence and Detection Procedures Used in a Web-Based Survey Study With Adult Black Cisgender Women: Description of Lessons Learned and Recommendations.

JMIR Form Res

March 2025

Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.

Background: Online research studies enable engagement with more Black cisgender women in health-related research. However, fraudulent data collection responses in online studies raise important concerns about data integrity, particularly when incentives are involved.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the strengths and limitations of fraud deterrence and detection procedures implemented in an incentivized, cross-sectional, online study about HIV prevention and sexual health with Black cisgender women living in Texas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!