Introduction: This study investigates age-related differences in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) traits and childhood maltreatment (CM) experiences among adolescents, young adults, and older adults within a clinical sample.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed, involving 2029 outpatients aged 15-50 years from the Shanghai Mental Health Center. BPD traits were assessed using the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire 4th Edition Plus (PDQ-4+), and CM experiences were evaluated using the Child Trauma Questionnaire Short Form (CTQ-SF). Participants were categorized into three age groups: adolescents (15-21 years), young adults (22-30 years), and older adults (31-50 years).

Results: Adolescents reported significantly higher frequencies of BPD traits and diagnoses compared to young adults and older adults (=0.036). Specifically, identity disturbance and impulsivity were more pronounced in adolescents (<0.001). Additionally, adolescents reported higher levels of emotional (=15.987, <0.001) and physical abuse (=12.942, =0.002), while older adults reported higher levels of emotional and physical neglect. Logistic regression analysis identified key BPD criteria and CM subtypes that differentiated adolescents from adults.

Discussion: The findings underscore the importance of age-specific interventions in treating BPD and addressing childhood maltreatment. Adolescents exhibit distinct patterns of BPD traits and CM experiences, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794515PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1454328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bpd traits
12
young adults
12
older adults
12
age-related differences
8
differences borderline
8
borderline personality
8
personality disorder
8
traits childhood
8
childhood maltreatment
8
adults older
8

Similar Publications

Borderline personality disorder and antisocial traits in justice-involved males: Associations with aggression, violent crime, and adverse childhood experiences.

Psychiatry Res

March 2025

Institute for Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, Campus Homburg, Saarland University, Bldg. 90.3., Homburg 66421, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, Mainz 55131, Germany.

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) and antisocial traits are common in justice-involved samples, but research on their dynamics, precursors, and aftereffects regarding aggressive and violent behavior is scarce. In order to enlarge the current knowledge needed for effective risk assessment and reduction, the present study examined patterns of BPD and antisocial traits in a sample of 315 justice-involved males who had undergone psychological/psychiatric evaluation, focusing on their relations with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), self-reported physical aggression, as well as officially registered previous and future violent crime. Based on a comprehensive analysis of psychiatric/psychological evaluation reports and individuals' self-ratings, latent class analysis identified three distinct classes with (1) high probability of BPD and antisocial traits (n = 63), (2) high probability of antisocial traits only (n = 150), and (3) low probability of either (n = 102).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Autism without intellectual disability is diagnosed later and with greater difficulty in girls/women relative to boys/men. For autistic girls and women, the journey to an autism diagnosis may include one or more misdiagnoses. Misdiagnosis with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or borderline traits may be particularly common, and characteristics often observed in autistic girls and women may contribute specifically to a risk of misdiagnosis with BPD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Women who self-harm and experience complex mental health difficulties are frequently diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), also known as emotionally unstable personality disorder. Emerging research suggests that self-harm may often be better explained through the lens of autism, and that greater consideration should be given to the clients' motivations for self-harm. How time alone is experienced may also be a differentiating factor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!