Background: Removing inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) can reduce unnecessary exposure to 'watch' and 'reserve' groups of antibiotics and thereby reduce antimicrobial resistance. The most efficient model for a non-allergy-specialist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling (PADL) service has not been established.

Objective: To determine the costs to the UK National Health Service of a direct oral penicillin challenge (DPC) for low-risk patients with a PAL in three hospitals in England, each with a different non-allergy-specialist delivery model: pharmacist-led, nurse-led, and mixed multidisciplinary.

Methods: Cost analysis of the DPC pathway, including resources related to staff time and antibiotics. The effect of de-labelling on healthcare utilisation over 5 years was modelled using data from the published literature.

Results: In total, 2257 patients from the Acute Medical or Infectious Disease Unit (AMU/IDU), Pre-surgical, and Haematology-Oncology departments were screened. Subsequently, 126 underwent DPC, and 122 were de-labelled. Twenty-two of these were de-labelled in time to affect their antibiotic regimen; 6 from AMU/IDU and 16 Pre-surgery. The DPC represented 22%-23% of the pathway cost in the pharmacist-led and mixed models, and 15% in the nurse-led model. Across departments and models, the cost per de-labelled patient varied between £577 (95% Credible Interval: 370, 633) for haematology-oncology patients to £2329 (947, 19,504) for AMU/IDU patients, both under the nurse-led model. After 5 years, recouping costs was unlikely for AMU/IDU patients under any model or for all patients combined under the mixed model.

Conclusions: The penicillin allergy de-labelling pathway cost was  ≥ 4-fold that of the DPC alone. Costs were up to 3 times higher in an acute compared to an elective setting. No short-term cost savings were identified from proactive or opportunistic penicillin allergy de-labelling in this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cea.14633DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penicillin allergy
20
allergy de-labelling
12
direct oral
8
oral penicillin
8
penicillin challenge
8
pathway cost
8
nurse-led model
8
amu/idu patients
8
penicillin
7
patients
7

Similar Publications

Background: While the reaction history is critical for drug allergy evaluations and is typically self-reported, there is no validated survey instrument to collect drug allergy history from patients.

Objective: To validate a survey instrument that collects patient-reported drug allergy history.

Methods: The Drug Allergy History Tool (DAHT) was revised after three rounds of cognitive testing, with data assessed for reliability, through test-retest comparison, and quality and validity, through a concordance analysis against electronic health record (EHR) allergist documentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients presents challenges. Options of effective regimens are lacking in areas where tetracycline is unavailable.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of replacing the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB, vonoprazan) in standard bismuth quadruple therapy containing doxycycline and metronidazole as a first-line treatment for H.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with a penicillin allergy label have an increased risk of surgical site infection. Although a decision tree was published in 2019 to define which patients could benefit from direct cephalosporin use in the perioperative setting, this strategy remains unvalidated. This consensus statement aimed to adapt it based on an expert consensus to cover persisting caveats and to adapt it to an environment with poor allergist resources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!