This study aimed to investigate the aesthetic aspect of screw-retained restorations by examining three different types of filling materials used for the access cavity, highlighting the significance of aesthetics in implant restorations. In this laboratory investigation, simulation samples of screw-retained restorations were filled with flowable composite resin (group F), opaque and flowable composite resin (group O) and porcelain plug (group P) at baseline (T0). The samples were subjected to thermocycling twice (T1 and T3), undergoing 1000 cycles in coffee, orange juice, and distilled water, followed by washing performed after each thermocycling (T2 and T4). Colorimetric analysis and surface roughness measurements were conducted, and the data were statistically analyzed using. two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), ,Tukey post hoc, two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and paired-t test. P<0.05 was considered significant. The type of filling material had a significant effect on the color difference observed between the restoration and filling materials (P<0.05). Notably, samples from group P exhibited a more pronounced color difference at T4, despite showing a lower color difference at T0, when compared to group O. The use of porcelain plugs did not provide a notable advantage over the combination of flowable and opaque composite resins, particularly given the difficulties in fabricating and positioning porcelain plugs within the access cavity. Therefore, it is recommended to utilize flowable composite resins in conjunction with an opaque composite resin layer beneath, to effectively conceal any dark shades from the underlying metal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792726 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i46.17177 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Dent
March 2025
Melbourne Dental School, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical impact of implant placement by novice implant clinicians in the narrow anterior ridge by fully guided (FG), pilot-guided (PG), and freehand (FH) placements.
Materials And Methods: A maxillary surgical model with missing incisors and a narrow ridge was designed. Two implants were planned in the lateral incisor locations to receive screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Compend Contin Educ Dent
February 2025
Clinical Professor and Director of Implant Education, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, New York.
Full-arch implant therapy with immediate provisionalization is a popular procedure. Conventionally, chairside conversion of a prefabricated prosthesis or an abutment-level impression is usually required. This case report describes a novel approach to picking up a prefabricated full-arch prosthesis utilizing various digital techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Funct Biomater
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of three types of dental implant restorations: a screw-and-cement-retained prosthetic system (SCRP); a cementless screw-retained prosthetic system (SRP); and a novel screwless hook-retained prosthetic system (HRP). Three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate biomechanical behavior. A comparative study of three dental implant prostheses was performed under two loading conditions: a vertical load of 100 N and an oblique load of 100 N at an angle of 30°.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent J (Basel)
February 2025
Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Replacing a maxillary central incisor and immediately placing an implant represents a clinical challenge. This case report demonstrates a full digital workflow to achieve a predictable implant placement and esthetically pleasing restoration for a 35-year-old male patient who suffered a horizontal root fracture after a sports accident. The patient's treatment included digital implant planning, minimally traumatic tooth extraction, computer-guided implant placement, soft tissue augmentation, and a provisional restoration to contour the augmented gingival tissues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMaterials (Basel)
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Center for Implantology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
The aim is to investigate the impact of retention type, implant/abutment angulation, and the presence of sealant/antimicrobial agents on screw loosening of implant-supported restorations. Fifty dental implants along with their respective abutments and screws were allocated to five groups (n = 10). The groups were categorized based on type of crown retention (screw-/cement-retained), implant/abutment angulation (0°/20°), and type of disinfectant/sealant as follows: Cem_control (cemented/0°/none), Cem_GP (cemented/0°/gutta-percha), Cem_CHX (cemented/0°/chlorhexidine), Cem_Ang (cemented/20°/none), and Screw (screwed/0°/ none).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!