Background: The importance of enabling patients to provide feedback on their experience of healthcare is widely accepted but there are few appropriate measures to enable children and young people to directly provide feedback, particularly those with intellectual disability or younger children. Our primary aim was to develop and test patient-reported experience measures for children and young people with intellectual disability who use inpatient hospital services. A secondary aim was to test these measures with younger children aged 4-7 years without intellectual disability.

Methods: A hospital inpatient patient-reported experience measure previously developed for children aged 8-11 years was revised iteratively in conjunction with a parent advisory group (comprising five parents of children and young people with and without intellectual disability) and children and young people with intellectual disability. The final patient-reported experience measure was tested in children's inpatient wards at seven hospitals in England over a 3-month period.

Results: Parents suggested a need for a single patient-reported experience measure for all children with intellectual disability which contained simpler language, fewer questions and response options, and images to illustrate each question. The final patient-reported experience measure had 22 questions, each with a corresponding image, and a free text box in which children could add anything further. Questions addressed environment, people, care and treatment and safety. During testing at seven children's hospitals, 52 children and young people with intellectual disability (4-18 years) and 76 children without intellectual disability (4-7 years), all of whom received inpatient care, completed the patient-reported experience measure. Two percent of data were missing; in 16 instances respondents either ticked two responses or placed a tick between two response categories. Half the respondents added comments and/or drew a picture.

Conclusion: The development of a patient-reported experience measure for children and young people with intellectual disability provides a previously unavailable opportunity for them to report on their experiences of inpatient care and have their voices heard. Future work to extend testing to a wider group is underway and will enable us to clarify whether one patient-reported experience measure is valid and reliable for all children and young people with intellectual disability.

Patient Or Public Contribution: A parent advisory group, comprising parents/carers of young people with or without a learning disability, advised on all aspects of the wider study design and specifically on revisions to the measure reported in this manuscript. The parent advisory group met twice a year during the study with email contact between meetings for specific requests and study updates. Representatives of the advisory group also attended the study steering group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791408PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.70168DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

young people
36
intellectual disability
36
children young
32
patient-reported experience
32
people intellectual
28
experience measure
28
advisory group
16
children
14
parent advisory
12
intellectual
11

Similar Publications

Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Subclinical Markers of Cardiovascular Harm.

J Am Coll Cardiol

March 2025

Ciccarone Center for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Cigarette smoking is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular harm.

Objectives: The study sought to explore the detailed relationships between smoking intensity, pack-years, and time since cessation with inflammation, thrombosis, and subclinical atherosclerosis markers of cardiovascular harm.

Methods: We included 182,364 participants (mean age 58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The well-being of nursing students is strongly affected by their mental health.

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a peer-led support group intervention based on autogenic training (soRELAX) on the well-being and mental health of nursing students.

Methods: A pilot mixed convergent design was used with a single group and three assessments: baseline, at 7 weeks, and at 12 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Social support is a crucial factor in mitigating psychological distress among nursing students. However, the specific mechanism through which social support influences psychological distress, particularly the mediating role of school-life interference, remains underexplored. Aim The researchers investigated the relationship between social support and psychological distress in nursing students and examined the extent to which school-life interference mediates this relationship.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The "Fundamentals of Nursing" course is crucial for equipping novice undergraduate nursing students with essential skills for their professional practice. However, a gap exists between nursing education and clinical readiness-a challenge exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and issues like absenteeism in clinical sessions. The flipped classroom has been proposed as an innovative strategy to bridge this gap, offering students opportunities for self-paced learning before class and enabling more active, hands-on practice during lab sessions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!