The optimism bias is a cognitive bias where individuals overestimate the likelihood of good outcomes and underestimate the likelihood of bad outcomes. Associated with improved quality of life, optimism bias is considered to be adaptive and is a promising avenue of research for mental health interventions in conditions where individuals lack optimism such as major depressive disorder. Here we lay the groundwork for future research on optimism as an intervention by introducing a domain general formal model of optimism bias, which can be applied in different task settings. Employing the active inference framework, we propose a model of the optimism bias as high precision likelihood biased towards positive outcomes. First, we simulate how optimism may be lost during development by exposure to negative events. We then ground our model in the empirical literature by showing how the developmentally acquired differences in optimism are expressed in a belief updating task typically used to assess optimism bias. Finally, we show how optimism affects action in a modified two-armed bandit task. Our model and the simulations it affords provide a computational basis for understanding how optimism bias may emerge, how it may be expressed in standard tasks used to assess optimism, and how it affects agents' decision-making and actions; in combination, this provides a basis for future research on optimism as a mental health intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784508 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/cpsy.125 | DOI Listing |
J Med Internet Res
February 2025
Cellular Communication Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Background: The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) presents transformative potential for diagnostic medicine, offering opportunities to enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce costs, and improve patient outcomes.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the expected future impact of AI on diagnostic medicine by comparing global researchers' expectations using 2 cross-sectional surveys.
Methods: The surveys were conducted in September 2020 and February 2023.
Health Econ Rev
February 2025
Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Background: Foodborne disease is a great concern to low- and middle-income countries. To prevent illness and death, intervention strategies need to be implemented across the food safety system and should include promoting the adoption of safe food handling practices. The positive association between education and health has been well-established, and one possible mechanism is that education may improve health by encouraging individuals to adopt more appropriate protective practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOsteoarthr Cartil Open
March 2025
The Parker Institute at Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Objective: This study explored if the patient-experience and the affect heuristic influenced improvements in painful symptoms, in response to open label placebo injections in patients with knee OA. It furthermore explored if other cognitive biases or heuristics were involved in the response to open-label placebo.
Method: A mixed method study in a pre-specified knee OA cohort.
Clin Psychol Psychother
February 2025
Mental Health Research Group (MHeRG), Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Alfonso X el Sabio University, Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain.
Introduction: Attachment style and working alliance are two fundamental variables in psychotherapy. This systematic review aims to provide data on the relationship between therapist attachment and alliance in psychotherapy, updating a previous review and providing a quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis).
Method: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement recommendations were followed.
Comput Psychiatr
January 2025
Monash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
The optimism bias is a cognitive bias where individuals overestimate the likelihood of good outcomes and underestimate the likelihood of bad outcomes. Associated with improved quality of life, optimism bias is considered to be adaptive and is a promising avenue of research for mental health interventions in conditions where individuals lack optimism such as major depressive disorder. Here we lay the groundwork for future research on optimism as an intervention by introducing a domain general formal model of optimism bias, which can be applied in different task settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!