Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and histopathological effectiveness of topical amniotic membrane extract (AME) applied at a clinically relevant dose in an experimental corneal alkaline burn model and to compare the results with amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as one of the most frequently used biologically based treatment options. To create an alkaline burn model, NaOH-impregnated filter paper was applied to all rabbits for 30 s. Rabbits were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 6): AME eye drop; Group 2 (n = 6): AMT; Group 3 (n = 4): control group. AME eye drops were applied as 1 drop 4 times a day for 28 days. Clinical findings including corneal opacity, corneal vascularization, limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) was evaluated and graded in accordance with the updated literature. On day 28, corneas were histopathologically examined under the light microscope. Stromal inflammation, stromal fibrosis, intraepithelial edema, and corneal vascularization were scored in each group. When the groups were compared clinically, corneal opacity was significantly (p = 0.009) lower in the AME group. While lower LSCD grades were observed in the AME group, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Histopathologically; in the AME group, stromal inflammatory cell inflammation, corneal vascularization, intraepithelial edema, stromal fibrosis, and metaplastic epithelial layer thickness were significantly (p = 0.004; p = 0.022; p = 0.008; p = 0.002; p = 0.002, respectively) lower than the other groups.In this study, it was shown that AME eye drops were clinically and histopathologically more successful in providing corneal healing than the AMT and control groups in the ocular alkaline burn model. These findings are valuable as they show that AME eye drops may be an easy-to-apply biologically based treatment alternative to AMT in chemical burns.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2025.110259 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!