Previous studies have demonstrated that focus significantly alters sentential prosody in Persian. However, research on the phonetic realization of non-corrective narrow focus is scarce compared to that on broad and corrective focus. This paper presents a systematic production study investigating whether Persian speakers distinguish between three focus structures on target words that bear a pitch accent, that is, broad, narrow, and corrective focus. In a multidimensional phonetic analysis, we investigated the parameters of intensity, duration, and F0. Taking a local perspective, results show that the duration of the target word is a robust cue for focus marking in both syllables of the word, exhibiting a three-step pattern (corrective > narrow > broad). In the first syllable, intensity is a reliable cue to distinguish broad focus from the other two focus types, with higher intensities in broad focus. In the accented syllable, a different two-step pattern is observed, with narrow and corrective focus showing larger F0 spans than broad focus. Taking a global perspective that considers the parts of the utterance before and after the target word, we find a lowering of F0 and decreased intensity for narrow and corrective focus in the pre-target region. In the post-target region, we find strong evidence for differences in mean F0 and intensity with lower F0 in corrective focus than in broad and narrow focus, while the intensity is lower in narrow and corrective focus than in broad focus. Our analysis deepens our understanding of Persian prosody.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00238309241311924 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
March 2025
Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashiku, Tokyo, Japan.
Purpose: Several risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) have been reported. High pelvic incidence (PI) has been identified as risk factors for L4 anterior slip in cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Correcting the slip with L4-L5 fixation merely restores the lumbar alignment, but the PI itself remains unchanged.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cataract Refract Surg
March 2025
Ophthalmology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra (CHUC), Unidade Local de Saúde (ULS) de Coimbra, Portugal.
Purpose: To assess the real-life impact of preoperative visual simulations with SimVis Gekko (SVG) on predicting postoperative visual performance in patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with trifocal or extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOL).
Setting: Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal.
Design: Single-center prospective observational cohort study.
BMC Nurs
March 2025
NuMIQ Research Focus Area, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, North West University, Mahikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046 Mmabatho 2745, Mafikeng, South Africa.
Arch Craniofac Surg
February 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Sungnam, Korea.
Genioplasty is a crucial procedure in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery for both aesthetic and functional chin correction. The procedure is performed using various techniques-including sliding genioplasty, advancement, setback, vertical augmentation, and narrowing genioplasty-with each approach offering specific benefits tailored to patient needs. Advances in virtual surgical planning, pre-bent absorbable plates, and three-dimensional printing technology have enhanced the precision of genioplasty, leading to improved functional and aesthetic outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!