Background: Adult spinal deformities, affecting up to 60% of individuals older than 60 years, often require long segment fusions. Constructs spanning the lumbosacral junction commonly include pelvic fixation. Despite robust pelvic fixation, distal junctional failure, such as pseudoarthrosis, bone fracture, and instrumentation failure, occurs in 24%-34% of these cases. A novel implant designed for both durable pelvic fixation and sacroiliac joint fusion was recently cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration. This implant is engineered to address some of the pelvic fixation failure mechanisms by reducing motion at the lumbosacral junction and sacroiliac joint while decreasing stress on S1 pedicle screws and S2AI implants.

Objective: To determine the failure rate of a novel osseointegrative implant for spinopelvic fixation/fusion.

Study Design: Analysis of manufacturer postmarket surveillance database.

Methods: A postmarket surveillance database was analyzed to determine the type and rate of complaints and revisions of a novel osseointegrative implant. These were then compared with the published literature.

Results: A total of 15,628 implants were identified in 6907 patients. The postmarket surveillance of the novel screw fusion device revealed a low complaint rate of 0.75% and no postoperative implant breakage. Revision procedures were mostly due to set screw dissociation (0.4%) and implant loosening (0.15%), which was primarily linked to pre-existing conditions or infection. The mean (SD) time from index procedure to the complaint was 7.1 (5.4) months.

Conclusions: Compared with published literature, this novel osseointegrative implant demonstrates a significantly lower incidence of set screw dissociation than traditional pelvic screws with no incidence of breakage or back out, underscoring its durable integration with bone, with low rates of revisions and mechanical failures.

Clinical Relevance: A novel osseointegrative implant offers reduced rates of mechanical failures and revisions, helping to reduce complications in pelvic fixation procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14444/8720DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osseointegrative implant
20
pelvic fixation
20
postmarket surveillance
16
novel osseointegrative
16
implant
9
determine failure
8
failure rate
8
lumbosacral junction
8
sacroiliac joint
8
compared published
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study assessed the impact of the buccal bone on hard and soft tissues in submerged and non-submerged immediate implants using a minipig model.

Methods: Sixty-five titanium implants (Camlog Progressive Line) were placed in four minipigs immediately after tooth extraction. All non-submerged (NSM) implants received a mechanically induced buccal bone defect (NSM-BD), whereas the submerged group (SM) was classified as defective (SM-BD) and intact (SM-BI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Peri-implantitis represents a significant challenge in dental implantology, characterized by inflammatory reactions around osseointegrated dental implants that lead to progressive alveolar bone loss.

Objectives: To generate a scoping review that evaluates the efficacy of implantoplasty and Er:YAG laser therapies in managing peri-implantitis by synthesizing recent evidence on their impact on key clinical parameters-including probing depth reduction, bleeding on probing improvement, and marginal bone level stabilization-and to explore the potential synergistic benefits of combining these modalities for enhanced treatment outcomes.

Material And Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from January 2018 to the present.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Osseointegration of a bone-anchored limb (BAL) is an emerging rehabilitation technique that offers significant advantages over traditional socket prostheses. By addressing functional limitations and recurrent cutaneous complications, BAL systems have shown an 82%-90% increase in daily prosthesis use among patients, who also report improvements in functional ability, balance, comfort, and overall quality of life. Despite these benefits, the process of patient selection for BAL remains underdeveloped, with evidence-based guidelines still in their infancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Soft tissue complications are among the most common reasons for revision surgery following transdermal, bone-anchored osseointegration. While many orthopaedic surgeons are familiar and experienced with the use of intramedullary implants, the soft tissue management surrounding a percutaneous and permanent implant in continuity with the outside environment remains a challenging problem. With this in mind, we present our rationale and a framework for soft tissue considerations in preparation for bone-anchored osseointegration based on early experiences with most commercially available osseointegration systems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preclinical models of osseointegrated orthopaedic implants tend to focus on implant stability, surface modifications to enhance integration with host tissue, and reduction in iatrogenic contamination through antibiotic-eluting/bacteria-resistant coatings. While these studies are imperative to early success in osseointegration, continued success of percutaneous devices throughout the lifespan of the patient is also critically important. A perpetual challenge to the implant is formation of bacterial biofilm on the abutment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!