A proposed state administrative rule would have required medical ethicists to approve certain aspects of gender-affirming care. The authors argue the proposed rule lacked appropriate justification compared to other instances of state-mandated ethics oversight and would undermine trust, raise practical challenges, and send harmful messages to society, patients, and providers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2024.170 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
State-Mandated Ethics Oversight Is Inappropriate for Gender-Affirming Care.
J Law Med Ethics
January 2025
NEUROETHICS PROGRAM, CENTER FOR BIOETHICS, NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE, CLEVELAND CLINIC, CLEVELAND, OH, USA.
A proposed state administrative rule would have required medical ethicists to approve certain aspects of gender-affirming care. The authors argue the proposed rule lacked appropriate justification compared to other instances of state-mandated ethics oversight and would undermine trust, raise practical challenges, and send harmful messages to society, patients, and providers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhat Follows From State-Mandated Pregnancy?
Ann Intern Med
February 2023
Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York (C.J.C.).
Nurses' Role in Addressing Social Determinants of Health: A Case Study on the Social Determinants of Health Taskforce of Baltimore City.
J Addict Nurs
September 2022
Yolanda Ogbolu, PhD, CRNP, FNAP, FAAN, University of Maryland Baltimore.
In recent years there has been increased interest in the social determinants of health (SDoH) by nurses and other healthcare professionals. Numerous seminars and discussions among nurses and other health professionals have focused on addressing social, economic, and environmental factors that impact the health and wellbeing of individuals and communities. Although these conversations are important and represent a movement towards health and social justice, they may be insufficient to address health inequities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThird-party Compliance With State-Mandated Orthodontic Coverage for Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Care in California: An Insurance Claim Thematic Analysis.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
June 2023
University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Background: California Senate Bill 630 (SB630) enacted statutorily mandated health plan coverage for orthodontic care of patients with cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies in 2009, which was effective from July 1, 2010. In this qualitative analysis, third-party compliance with SB630 in a university-based cleft and craniofacial orthodontic program is evaluated.
Methods: Privately insured patients that experienced a coverage delay or denial of orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate in the University of California, San Francisco Cleft and Craniofacial Orthodontic Program between July 1, 2010 and October 28, 2020 were identified.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!