Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation within the first year after mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure, focusing on long-term outcomes, including overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE), and ischaemic stroke.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in South Korea, identifying 10,127 patients who underwent MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure between 2005 and 2020. Patients were classified into the PPM and non-PPM groups based on PPM implantation within one year postoperatively. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and secondary outcomes included risk factors for overall mortality, IE and ischaemic stroke. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models were utilized for statistical analysis.
Results: Of the total cohort, 178 patients (1.76%) underwent PPM implantation. The overall mortality during the follow-up period was 20.5%, with no significant difference between the PPM and non-PPM groups. PPM implantation was not a significant risk factor for overall mortality (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.825; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.598-1.140; p = 0.244) or ischaemic stroke. However, PPM implantation was associated with a significantly increased risk of IE (HR, 2.015; 95% CI, 1.179-3.442; p = 0.010).
Conclusions: PPM implantation within the first year after MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure does not significantly impact long-term mortality or ischaemic stroke risk but is associated with an increased risk of IE. The Cox-maze procedure remains advisable for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MV surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf018 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!