Objective: This study aimed to investigate loss to follow-up (LFU) rates within breast and cervical cancer screening programs in Kenitra-Morocco, identifying contributing factors from both patient and healthcare worker perspectives to enhance care continuity.

Methods: The study was a non-experimental, mixed-methods design conducted in three-phases. We started by identifying LFU women and their characteristics from medical records, interviewing LFU women to ascertain reasons for discontinuation, and surveying healthcare workers for perceived determinants of LFU through semi-structured questionnaires. The study covered primary healthcare centers, the Reproductive Health Reference Center (RCRH) in Kenitra, and the National Institute of Oncology (NIO) in Rabat.

Results: Of 1,225 women studied, 94 cancer cases were diagnosed, with LFU rates varying across care stages. Key factors associated with LFU included age (p<0.005, OR=1.67, CI[1.2-2.4]), marital status (p<0.03, OR=0.8, CI[0.65-0.98]), distance from healthcare facilities (p<0.00, OR=2, CI[1.3-4.0]), and medical coverage (p<0.03, OR=2.3, CI[1.3-4.0]). Healthcare workers cited poor communication, organizational issues, and staffing shortages as barriers to follow-up.

Conclusions: The study underscores LFU's multifaceted reasons in Kenitra's cancer screening programs, suggesting improvements in communication after a positive screening test, re-engagement strategies, and financial accessibility. Addressing these issues is essential for reducing LFU rates, enhancing cancer care outcomes, and decreasing breast and cervical cancer mortality in Morocco.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.1.67DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer screening
8
breast cervical
8
lfu rates
8
lfu women
8
lfu
6
breaking barriers
4
barriers cancer
4
screening understanding
4
understanding participant
4
participant dropout
4

Similar Publications

Background: The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.

Methods: We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Foundation Models for Translational Cancer Biology.

Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci

January 2025

1Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA;

Cancer remains a leading cause of death globally. The complexity and diversity of cancer-related datasets across different specialties pose challenges in refining precision medicine for oncology. Foundation models offer a promising solution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has overloaded healthcare systems worldwide. Other diseases, such as neoplasms, including gastric cancer, remained prevalent and had their treatment compromised.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of gastric cancer and adherence to the recommended preoperative COVID-19 screening protocol.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mammography is one of the main methods available for breast cancer screening in Brazil. However, differences in timely access and performance of the exam can be highlighted based on social determinants of health, considered relevant due to their influence on the health situation of a population. Thus, the present study aimed to identify the social determinants of health associated with access to and performance of mammography in Brazilian women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To undertake a mixed-methodology implementation study to improve the well-being of men with gastrointestinal late effects following radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer. All men completed a validated screening tool for late bowel effects (ALERT-B) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Score (GSRS); men with a positive score on ALERT-B were offered management following a peer reviewed algorithm for pelvic radiation disease (PRD). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline, 6 and 12 months; and healthcare resource usage (HRU) and patient, support-giver, staff experience and acceptability of staff training (qualitative analysis) were assessed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!