Optimization of immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis.

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of various immunotherapy-based combination therapies for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
  • A meta-analysis of seven clinical studies involving 5542 patients shows that the combination of Toripalimab + Axitinib offers the best outcomes for progression-free and overall survival compared to other therapies.
  • While Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab demonstrated favorable safety, personalized treatment approaches are needed to optimize patient care while minimizing risks.

Article Abstract

Background: Despite numerous meta-analyses comparing the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based combination therapies, the optimal therapeutic combinations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the optimal application of all immunotherapy-based combination therapy for advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma, focusing on efficacy and safety.

Methods: We systemically searched the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for studies regarding the first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma until April 15, 2024. We used network meta-analysis using a random effect model to facilitate direct and indirect treatment comparisons across outcomes.

Results: Seven clinical studies, including 5542 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, were included in the network meta-analysis analysis. Regarding progression-free survival and overall survival, combined Toripalimab + Axitinib significantly outperformed other immunotherapy-based combination therapies. This regimen significantly improved progression-free survival in the intermediate/poor risk group when stratified by prognosis prediction risks compared to sunitinib alone. For the objective response rate, Avelumab + Axitinib was the most preferred strategy in the favorable-risk group, while Nivolumab + Cabozantinib was favored in the intermediate/poor-risk group compared to other immunotherapy-based combinations. The combinations of Nivolumab + Ipilimumab and Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab had favorable safety profiles.

Conclusions: Immunotherapy-based combination therapies significantly improved progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared to sunitinib monotherapy. However, careful monitoring and personalized treatment strategies are required to balance efficacy and safety in patients with underlying conditions. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and elucidating the mechanisms of adverse events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104630DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal cell
20
cell carcinoma
20
immunotherapy-based combination
20
metastatic renal
16
network meta-analysis
12
combination therapies
12
progression-free survival
12
immunotherapy-based combinations
8
efficacy safety
8
combination therapy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!