Removal of the rib and adjacent cartilage is a common step for exposure of the recipient chest vessels in free-flap breast reconstructions. However, this adds both short- and long-term morbidity to the procedure. We describe our experience in avoiding rib removal in microvascular breast reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed recipient vessel preparation in free-flap breast reconstructions performed by a single surgeon (SGB). A total of 556 consecutive patients, totaling 1106 flaps over 5 years, were assessed. Recipient vessels included IMA in 1068 flaps and internal mammary perforator in 38 DIEP flaps. Nine patients underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction with a cross-chest anastomosis, where the IMA was the recipient. Also, the IMA was used in 171 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with stacked flaps. No instances of complete rib resection were reported. However, in two cases of delayed DIEP flap reconstruction without a history of radiation, resection of 20% of the rib was required for safe vessel preparation. No intraoperative complications were observed, and three flaps from different patients were lost (one PAP and two DIEPs). Microsurgery in free-flap breast reconstructions has greatly evolved in the past two decades. Exposure of the IMA recipient vessels typically involves the removal of a portion of the intercostal cartilage and the rib, allowing comfortable and safe management of the vasculature during dissection and anastomosis. Nonetheless, excessive removal often leads to short-term increased pain and long-term cosmetic and functional complications, such as a noticeable depression of the chest wall especially noted in thin patients with small flaps. Our approach can be safely employed to preserve the anatomy and decrease pain, allowing for outpatient performance of these procedures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020602 | DOI Listing |
Int J Surg Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Introduction: Necrotising soft tissue infection (NSTI) is an exceptionally dangerous infectious disease targeting soft tissues with high mortality as well as morbidity. The aim of reconstructive surgery after initial debridement is to maintain function as well as to achieve a satisfactory cosmetic result.
Presentation Of Case: A 50-year-old male presented with necrotising soft tissue infection on the thorax and left upper arm following mastectomy for breast cancer.
J Clin Med
January 2025
My Houston Surgeons, 9230 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77055, USA.
Removal of the rib and adjacent cartilage is a common step for exposure of the recipient chest vessels in free-flap breast reconstructions. However, this adds both short- and long-term morbidity to the procedure. We describe our experience in avoiding rib removal in microvascular breast reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
January 2025
Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
The autologous reconstruction of the female breast using a microsurgical DIEP flap is a reliable and safe method. To detect impairments early and preserve the microvascular flap through timely revision, a better understanding of physiologic perfusion dynamics is necessary. This exploratory study examines changes in microcirculation in free DIEP flaps within the first 72 h after vascular anastomosis using laser Doppler flowmetry and white-light spectrophotometry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background: There has been a delayed, yet steady uptake of robotic-assisted surgery over the past decade within the field of plastic surgery. In an era of rapidly evolving scientific and technological development, there is a need for an update on the current literature for robotic-assisted plastic surgery procedures.
Methods: Searches were conducted across major databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, and Central for published literature from March 2023 to December 2024.
JPRAS Open
March 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
Breast revision surgery is often necessary in patients following postmastectomy breast reconstruction with free autologous flaps for aesthetic improvement. Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy continue to be expanded oncologically. However, revision techniques for aesthetic concerns following breast reconstruction are underreported in the literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!