The aim of this systematic review was to assess clinical trials on the efficiency of sinus lift techniques with and without bone grafting in the atrophic posterior maxilla. This article was written under the PRISMA and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched until December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Risk of Bias tool guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed for implant survival rate (ISR), marginal bone loss (MBL), and endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG). At the end of the electronic search, 5 clinical trials were considered eligible. Statistical analysis was achieved for osteotome sinus floor elevation. The ISR at 3 years had a risk ratio (RR) of 0.98 [0.90, 1.07] (CI 95%), = 0.7, and at 5 years, RR 1.02 [0.93, 1.11] (CI 95%), = 0.68. The MBL, at 3 years, indicated a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.01 [-0.15, 0.16] (CI 95%), = 0.93, and at 5 years, WMD of -0.08 [-0.53, 0.37] (CI 95%), = 0.73. ESBG at 3 years had a WMD of -0.44 [-1.05, 0.17] (CI 95%), = 0.16, and at 5 years, WMD of -0.61 [-1.63, 0.41] (CI 95%), = 0.24. The available evidence underlines that the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone graft may be used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina61010104DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sinus floor
12
floor elevation
12
clinical trials
12
years wmd
12
bone graft
8
risk bias
8
statistical analysis
8
osteotome sinus
8
years
6
95%
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!