DNA Damage Response Mutants Challenged with Genotoxic Agents-A Different Experimental Approach to Investigate the and Genes.

Genes (Basel)

Department of Biology and Biotechnology "L. Spallanzani", University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Published: January 2025

DNA damage response (DDR) is a highly conserved and complex signal transduction network required for preserving genome integrity. DNA repair pathways downstream of DDR include the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase1 (TDP1) enzyme that hydrolyses the phosphodiester bond between the tyrosine residue of topoisomerase I (TopI) and 3'-phosphate end of DNA. A small TDP1 subfamily, composed of TDP1α and TDP1β, is present in plants. The aim of this work was to investigate the role of the two genes in the DDR context. A series of DDR single and double mutants defective in the , , , , and genes, treated with the genotoxic agents camptothecin (CPT, inhibitor of TopI) and NSC120686 (NSC, inhibitor of TDP1), were used. These compounds were specifically used due to their known impact on the TDP1 function. The effect of the treatments was assessed via phenotypic analyses that included germination percentage, speed, and seedling growth. Subsequently, the expression of the and genes was monitored through qRT-PCR. Overall, the gathered data indicate that the mutant was highly sensitive to NSC120686, both phenotypically and concerning the gene expression profiles. Alternatively, the upregulation of in , , and supports its implication in the replication stress response. The current study demonstrates that genotoxic stress induced by CPT and NSC has a genotype-dependent effect reflected by a differential expression of genes and early phenotypic development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes16010103DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dna damage
8
damage response
8
expression genes
8
genes
5
dna
4
response mutants
4
mutants challenged
4
challenged genotoxic
4
genotoxic agents-a
4
agents-a experimental
4

Similar Publications

DNA damage triggers heritable alterations in DNA methylation patterns in Arabidopsis.

Mol Plant

January 2025

State Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; Beijing Life Science Academy, Beijing 102299, China. Electronic address:

It has been hypothesized that DNA damage has the potential to induce DNA hypermethylation, contributing to carcinogenesis in mammals. However, there is no sufficient evidence to support that DNA damage can cause genome-wide DNA hypermethylation. Here, we demonstrated that DNA single-strand breaks with 3'-blocked ends (DNA 3'-blocks) can not only reinforce DNA methylation at normally methylated loci but also can induce DNA methylation at normally nonmethylated loci in plants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Prior sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) thresholds for diagnosing male infertility and predicting assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes fluctuated between 15 and 30%, with no agreed standard. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the sperm DFI on early embryonic development during ART treatments and establish appropriate DFI cut-off values.

Methods: Retrospectively analyzed 913 couple's ART cycles from 2021 to 2022, encompassing 1,476 IVF and 295 ICSI cycles, following strict criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC), particularly high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), is the leading cause of mortality from gynecological malignancies worldwide. Despite the initial effectiveness of treatment, acquired resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) represents a major challenge for the clinical management of HGSOC, highlighting the necessity for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This study investigated the role of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3), a pivotal regulator of glycolysis, in PARPi resistance and explored its potential as a therapeutic target to overcome PARPi resistance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The role of Box A of HMGB1 in producing γH2AX associated DNA breaks in lung cancer.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Center of Excellence in Molecular Genetics of Cancer and Human Diseases, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

An ideal chemotherapeutic agent damages DNA, specifically in cancer cells, without harming normal cells. Recently, we used Box A of HMGB1 plasmid as molecular scissors to produce DNA gaps in normal cells. The DNA gap relieves DNA tension and increases DNA strength, preventing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

CHD6 has poly(ADP-ribose)- and DNA-binding domains and regulates PARP1/2-trapping inhibitor sensitivity via abasic site repair.

Nat Commun

January 2025

Robson DNA Science Centre, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

To tolerate oxidative stress, cells enable DNA repair responses often sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymerase 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibition-an intervention effective against cancers lacking BRCA1/2. Here, we demonstrate that mutating the CHD6 chromatin remodeler sensitizes cells to PARP1/2 inhibitors in a manner distinct from BRCA1, and that CHD6 recruitment to DNA damage requires cooperation between PAR- and DNA-binding domains essential for nucleosome sliding activity. CHD6 displays direct PAR-binding, interacts with PARP-1 and other PAR-associated proteins, and combined DNA- and PAR-binding loss eliminates CHD6 relocalization to DNA damage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!