One-week test-retest stability of heart rate variability during rest and deep breathing.

Physiol Meas

Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Universitatsklinikum Jena, Philosophenweg 3, Jena, Thüringen, 07743, GERMANY.

Published: January 2025

Heart rate variability (HRV) is an important indicator of cardiac autonomic function. Given its clinical significance, reliable HRV assessment is crucial. Here, we assessed test-retest stability, as a key aspect of reliability, quantifying the consistency of a measure when repeated under the same conditions. This observational study includes healthy individuals. A 20-minute electrocardiogram was recorded at rest in a supine position and during deep breathing in two lab sessions within one week, at the same time of day. HRV indices from time domain, frequency domain, nonlinear dynamics, and information-theoretic complexity were assessed using a validated toolbox. Additionally, heart rate variations per respiratory cycle were evaluated during deep breathing. Lifestyle factors such as perceived stress, mood, physical activity, sleep quality were assessed prior to both sessions. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV) were used to assess the concordance between the two measurements and the relative deviation, respectively. From 62 screened individuals, 51 participants were recruited from the local community. One participant opted out for personal reasons, and another with frequent premature beats was excluded, leaving a final sample of 49 individuals. Most self-rated psychological and lifestyle indicators showed substantial agreement, though participants reported less stress and better mood in the second session. At rest, ICC of HRV ranged from 0.50 to 0.83, with CV from 5% to 41%. Spectral HRV measures were less reliable than time domain parameters. Nonlinear and time domain features had substantial to nearly perfect agreement. Complexity measures had low CVs but limited test-retest correlation. The stability indices of HRV during deep breathing were not significantly different from those during rest. Test-retest differences in RMSSD were not sufficiently explained by lifestyle factors. Test-retest stability of HRV depends considerably on chosen measures. Our data suggest that HRV can be assessed reliably using time-domain indices at rest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adae51DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep breathing
16
test-retest stability
12
heart rate
12
time domain
12
rate variability
8
hrv
8
lifestyle factors
8
rest
5
one-week test-retest
4
stability
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!