This study investigated the cognitive and neural mechanisms of exact and approximate arithmetic using fNIRS technology during natural calculation processes (i.e., the production paradigm). Behavioral results showed (1) a significantly longer reaction time for exact arithmetic compared to approximate arithmetic, and (2) both exact and approximate arithmetic exhibited a problem size effect, with larger operands requiring more time. The fNIRS results further revealed differences in the neural bases underlying these two arithmetic processes, with exact arithmetic showing greater activation in the L-SFG (left superior frontal gyrus, CH16), while approximate arithmetic exhibited problem size effect in the right hemisphere. Additionally, larger operands registered more brain activities in the R-DLPFC (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, CH4), R-SFG (right superior frontal gyrus, CH2), and PMC and SMA (pre- and supplementary motor cortexes, CH3) compared to smaller operands in approximate arithmetic. Moreover, correlation analysis found a significant correlation between approximate arithmetic and semantic processing in the R-PMC and R-SMA (right pre- and supplementary motor cortexes). These findings suggest a neural dissociation between exact and approximate arithmetic, with exact arithmetic processing showing a dominant role in the left hemisphere, while approximate arithmetic processing was more sensitive in the right hemisphere.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs15010033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

approximate arithmetic
36
exact approximate
16
arithmetic
13
exact arithmetic
12
approximate
9
cognitive neural
8
production paradigm
8
arithmetic exact
8
arithmetic exhibited
8
exhibited problem
8

Similar Publications

This study investigated the cognitive and neural mechanisms of exact and approximate arithmetic using fNIRS technology during natural calculation processes (i.e., the production paradigm).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Growing evidence highlights the predictive power of cross-notation magnitude comparison (e.g., 2/5 vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fast Proxy Centers for the Jeffreys Centroid: The Jeffreys-Fisher-Rao Center and the Gauss-Bregman Inductive Center.

Entropy (Basel)

November 2024

Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Tokyo 141-0022, Japan.

The symmetric Kullback-Leibler centroid, also called the Jeffreys centroid, of a set of mutually absolutely continuous probability distributions on a measure space provides a notion of centrality which has proven useful in many tasks, including information retrieval, information fusion, and clustering. However, the Jeffreys centroid is not available in closed form for sets of categorical or multivariate normal distributions, two widely used statistical models, and thus needs to be approximated numerically in practice. In this paper, we first propose the new Jeffreys-Fisher-Rao center defined as the Fisher-Rao midpoint of the sided Kullback-Leibler centroids as a plug-in replacement of the Jeffreys centroid.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Milling chatter, a form of self-excited vibration, can cause significant damage in machining and manufacturing processes. By selecting appropriate milling parameters, milling chatter can be effectively mitigated without sacrificing milling efficiency. Within the framework of the semi-discretization scheme, this paper introduces the Newton-Simpson-based predictor-corrector methods to compute milling stability lobe diagrams.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Correlations of facial soft tissue thicknesses with craniometric dimensions improve craniofacial identification estimates: Fact or fiction?

J Forensic Sci

December 2024

Laboratory for Human Craniofacial and Skeletal Identification (HuCS-ID Lab), School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Linear regression (LR) models that use cranial dimensions to estimate facial soft tissue thicknesses (FSTTs) have been posited by Simpson and Henneberg to assist craniofacial identification. For these regression equations to work well, the independent (craniometrics) and dependent (FSTTs) variables must be tightly correlated; however, such relationships have not been routinely demonstrated for adult humans. To examine the strength of these relationships further, this study employed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to unambiguously measure cranial dimensions and FSTTs for 38 adult cadavers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!