Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.

J Rehabil Med

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Rehabilitation, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Published: January 2025

Objective: To evaluate existing evidence from published systematic reviews for the effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation interventions in adult patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical/health science databases up to October 2024. Bibliographies of pertinent articles, journals, and grey literature were searched. Three reviewers independently selected potential reviews, assessed methodological quality, and graded the quality of evidence for outcomes using validated tools.

Results: Sixty systematic reviews (761 randomized controlled trials) evaluated 5 categories of rehabilitation interventions. Over half of the included reviews (n = 31) were of moderate-high quality. The findings suggest: moderate-quality evidence for exercise interventions for improving physical fitness and quality of life; high-quality evidence for nutritional interventions in reducing postoperative infections; high-quality evidence for multimodal prehabilitation for improved preoperative functional capacity; moderate-quality evidence for nutritional interventions for improving humoral immunity, reducing inflammation, and length of stay; moderate-quality evidence for acupuncture in improving gastrointestinal functional recovery; psychosocial interventions in improving short-term quality of life and mental health, and lifestyle interventions for improved quality of life.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation interventions yielded positive effects across multiple outcomes. However, high-quality evidence is still needed to determine the most effective rehabilitation approaches for patients with colorectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v57.40021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rehabilitation interventions
16
patients colorectal
12
systematic reviews
12
moderate-quality evidence
12
interventions improving
12
high-quality evidence
12
interventions
9
colorectal cancer
8
evidence
8
quality life
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!