This systematic review reports on treatments for onychomycosis in patients with diabetes and the drug interactions with other drugs in regard to the complicated diabetic patient profile. The recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist were applied and the included studies were evaluated using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Searches were conducted in November 2023, using the PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases; studies on antifungal treatments for onychomycosis in patients with diabetes were included. Two authors performed the study selection and data extraction, and any discrepancies between the two reviewers were resolved through discussions with a third reviewer. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023442107). The systematic review included 10 studies that met the selection criteria. Mycological cures for mild to moderate onychomycosis were: (8.6%), 8% ciclopirox (8.6% 24 weeks and 54.3% 48 weeks), 10% efinaconazole (56.5-58.33%), terbinafine (73-76.6%), itraconazole (88.2%), and laser therapy (43.8%). No serious adverse effects or drug interactions were observed because patients with major complications, such as peripheral vascular disease, diabetic neuropathy, liver and renal dysfunction, poorly controlled diabetes, and severe onychomycosis, were excluded. The antifungal treatments described in the included studies are safe for patients with well-controlled diabetes, but there are currently no studies involving patients with diabetes and multiple complications, such as diabetic foot syndrome or severe onychomycosis. Thus, further research is needed in terms of this patient profile.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/idr17010004 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Ophthalmol
January 2025
Truhlsen Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Importance: Randomized clinical trials have shown the safety and efficacy of faricimab as a novel vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2 inhibitor in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and macular edema of various etiologies. However, more rare adverse events may not be considered in clinical trials.
Objective: To describe 3 eyes that developed irreversible vision loss following initial mild intraocular inflammation (IOI) to faricimab.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry-Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Importance: Associations between child maltreatment (CM) and health have been studied broadly, but most studies focus on multiplicity (number of experienced subtypes of CM). Studies assessing multiple CM characteristics are scarce, partly due to methodological challenges, and were mostly conducted in patient samples.
Objective: To determine the importance of CM characteristics in association with physical multimorbidity in adulthood for women and men in a German representative sample.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
America's Physician Groups, Washington, DC.
Importance: Many physician groups are in 2-sided risk payment arrangements with Medicare Advantage plans (at-risk MA). Analysis of quality and health resource use under such arrangements may inform ongoing Medicare policy concerning payment and service delivery.
Objective: To compare quality and efficiency measures under 2 payment models: at-risk MA and fee-for-service (FFS) MA.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2025
OptumLabs, Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
Importance: The increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) demands a better understanding of their association with thyroid cancer.
Objective: To estimate the risk of incident thyroid cancer among adults with type 2 diabetes being treated with GLP-1RA vs other common glucose-lowering medications.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a target trial emulation of a comparative effectiveness study using claims data for enrollees in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans across the US.
Int J Clin Pharm
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Deprescribing inappropriate cardiovascular and antidiabetic medication has been shown to be feasible and safe. Healthcare providers often perceive the deprescribing of cardiovascular and antidiabetic medication as a challenge and therefore it is still not widely implemented in daily practice.
Aim: The aim was to assess whether training focused on conducting a deprescribing-oriented clinical medication review (CMR) results in a reduction of the inappropriate use of cardiovascular and antidiabetic medicines.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!