Purpose: To investigate the impact of the distance from the most-anterior surface of the optic to the principal object plane (POP) and from the foremost haptic to the principal object plane (H-POP) on the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
Setting: A tertiary hospital.
Design: Optical simulation and retrospective cross-sectional study.
Methods: The optical simulation study plotted changes in the POP and H-POP as a function of IOL power using ICB00 IOL configuration data. The clinical study included 102 eyes of 102 patients implanted with ICB00 IOL to examine the correlation between changes in both the POP and the H-POP, and the prediction error calculated using the Barrett Universal II formula with varying IOL power.
Results: The ICB00 IOL showed minor fluctuations in the POP (0.21 mm to 0.30 mm) with changing IOL power. The H-POP increased stepwise from 5.0 D, peaking at 0.60 mm at 16.0 D, then decreased to a minimum of 0.14 mm at 34.0 D. The prediction error graph primarily mirrored the pattern of changes in the H-POP rather than the POP with varying IOL power. Linear regression showed a significant myopic shift in prediction error as IOL power increased beyond 16.0 D (Y = -0.069X+1.420, R2=0.178, p<0.001).
Conclusion: For the ICB00 IOL, the H-POP has more impact on IOL power calculation than the POP itself. For more accurate IOL power calculations, it is essential for all IOL manufacturers to provide comprehensive information on both optic and haptic geometries, which will enable the precise calculation of H-POP.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001611 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Distance from Haptic to Principal Object Plane.
J Cataract Refract Surg
January 2025
Great Lakes Eye Care, Saint Joseph, MI, USA.
Purpose: To investigate the impact of the distance from the most-anterior surface of the optic to the principal object plane (POP) and from the foremost haptic to the principal object plane (H-POP) on the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
Setting: A tertiary hospital.
Design: Optical simulation and retrospective cross-sectional study.
Comparative evaluation of several toric intraocular lens calculators for predicting postoperative refractive astigmatism in cataract surgery: a real-world study.
BMC Ophthalmol
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Background: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of six widely used toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculators in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation.
Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 53 eyes of 53 patients that underwent cataract extraction with toric IOL implantation using Zeiss 709 M. Six toric IOL calculators were evaluated: Barrett toric calculator (with predicted PCA, measured PCA, and TK), Kane formula (predicted PCA), and EVO 2.
Comparative analysis of axial length measurement method for eyes with submacular hemorrhage.
Jpn J Ophthalmol
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Purpose: To identify a method for comparing preoperative axial length (AL) measurements with postoperative AL in submacular hemorrhage (SMH).
Study Design: Retrospective.
Methods: This study included 30 patients who underwent vitrectomy for SMH (January 2016-January 2023) with preoperative and postoperative AL data.
Risk factors for biometry prediction error by Barrett Universal II intraocular lens formula in Chinese patients.
Int J Ophthalmol
January 2025
Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Aim: To investigate the influence of postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) positions on the accuracy of cataract surgery and examine the predictive factors of postoperative biometry prediction errors using the Barrett Universal II (BUII) IOL formula for calculation.
Methods: The prospective study included patients who had undergone cataract surgery performed by a single surgeon from June 2020 to April 2022. The collected data included the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal curvature, preoperative and postoperative central anterior chamber depths (ACD), axial length (AXL), IOL power, and refractive error.
The CASPAR study protocol. Can cervical stiffness predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour? a feasibility, cohort study.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Background: Induction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention in the UK, affecting up to 33% of deliveries. IOL aims to achieve a vaginal delivery prior to spontaneous onset of labour to prevent harm from ongoing pregnancy complications and is known to prevent stillbirths and reduce neonatal intensive care unit admissions. However, IOL doesn't come without risk and overall, 20% of mothers having an induction will still require a caesarean section birth and in primiparous mothers this rate is even higher.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!