Biologics approved and in development for atopic dermatitis offer life-changing clinical efficacy with a relatively banal long-term safety profile requiring no laboratory monitoring. Biologic therapies also have their drawbacks, including high payor cost and the need to be administered as every other week subcutaneous injections. Addressing these concerns, studies of longer dosing intervals have been performed in the formal clinical trial setting and during real-world clinical care. Here, we review the current progress and evidence of dose elongation strategies in biologics for atopic dermatitis. We find that across a diverse investigational landscape, a large patient population exists that is able to maintain adequate disease control on a prolonged dosing interval. Evidence of clinical predictors of maintenance of disease control using this approach is emerging, although the impact of increased dosing intervals as a strategy to mitigate side effects is lacking. Patients experiencing good disease control are ideal candidates to engage in a shared decision-making process between patients and providers that will facilitate an individualized dosing approach in practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20534 | DOI Listing |
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
January 2025
Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Biologics approved and in development for atopic dermatitis offer life-changing clinical efficacy with a relatively banal long-term safety profile requiring no laboratory monitoring. Biologic therapies also have their drawbacks, including high payor cost and the need to be administered as every other week subcutaneous injections. Addressing these concerns, studies of longer dosing intervals have been performed in the formal clinical trial setting and during real-world clinical care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Trop Pediatr
December 2024
Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, 06800, Turkey.
This study aimed to identify risk factors for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) failure in <30 weeks' gestation preterm neonates and compare morbidity in patients with and without NIV failure. This study included preterm neonates <30 weeks' gestation who received NIV support for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between infants with and without NIV failure within the first 72 hours after birth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Purpose: Rituximab has proven efficacy in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). However, vast majority of children inevitably experience relapse with B-cell repletion, necessitating repeat course of rituximab, which may increase the risk of adverse effects. The timing of additional dosing and optional dosing regimen of rituximab in pediatric patients with INS have yet to be determined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Immunol
January 2025
Department of Special Laboratory, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China.
Introduction: The long-term immunogenicity, adverse effects, influencing factors, and protection from booster vaccines remain unclear. Specifically, little is known regarding the humoral immunity and breakthrough infections associated with COVID-19 booster immunization. Therefore, we evaluated the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, influencing factors, and protective effects of the first coronavirus disease booster vaccine 23 months before and after implementation of dynamic zero epidemic control measures among healthcare staff.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurol
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China.
Objective: To systematically compare the benefits and risks of all thrombolytic agents (tenecteplase, reteplase, and alteplase) at different doses for thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Background: Alteplase is the cornerstone treatment for AIS, but alternative thrombolytic agents are needed. The efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and reteplase, compared to alteplase, remain unclear, as does the optimal dosing for these treatments.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!