Purpose: The new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy.

Methods: Adult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients.

Results: Of 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT).

Conclusions: Half of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

policy united
8
united states
8
rescue kidney
8
kidney-after-heart allocation
4
allocation policy
4
states benefit
4
benefit rescue
4
rescue kidney?
4
kidney? purpose
4
purpose rescue
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: The inclusion of social drivers of health (SDOH) into predictive algorithms of health outcomes has potential for improving algorithm interpretation, performance, generalizability, and transportability. However, there are limitations in the availability, understanding, and quality of SDOH variables, as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into algorithms when appropriate to do so. As such, few published algorithms include SDOH, and there is substantial methodological variability among those that do.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How Weight Bias and Stigma Undermine Healthcare Access and Utilization.

Curr Obes Rep

January 2025

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Box 100165, Gainesville, 32610-0165, FL, USA.

Purpose Of Review: To highlight recent evidence of the impact of weight bias and stigma on healthcare access and utilization.

Recent Findings: Healthcare access for patients with obesity is limited by weight-discriminatory policies such as body mass index cutoffs and weight loss requirements. These policies are based on flawed justifications without demonstrated medical benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Genomic medicine has features that make it preference sensitive and amenable to model-based health economic evaluation. Preferences of patients, caregivers, and clinicians related to the uptake and delivery of genomic medicine technologies and services that are not captured in health state utility weights can affect the intervention's cost-effectiveness and budget impact. However, there is currently no established or agreed-on approach for integrating preference information into economic evaluations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Marijuana use in adolescence is associated with significant adverse outcomes. Romantic relationships are an important context for marijuana use. Prior research suggests a bi-directional relationship between marijuana use and relationship functioning; however, the complex interplay between adolescent relationship dynamics and marijuana use remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introducing the PROMIS-16 profile 1.0.

Qual Life Res

January 2025

RAND Corporation, Behavioral and Policy Sciences, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!