Objective: Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headache. Our exploratory objectives compared symptoms of headache, mood, pain, and quality of life between active and sham transcranial direct stimulation combined with exercise therapy.
Background: Cervicogenic headache arises from injury to the cervical spine or degenerative diseases impacting cervical spine structure resulting in pain, reduced quality of life, and impaired function. Current standard-of-care treatments such as radiofrequency ablation, pharmacotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise therapy lack efficacy for some patients. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a neuromodulation technique that has shown promise in treating chronic pain conditions by positively altering neuronal activity but has not been evaluated as treatment for cervicogenic headache.
Methods: This double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, feasibility trial recruited 32 participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years that met the International Classification of Headache Disorders third edition criteria for cervicogenic headache. Participants were randomized to receive either active or sham transcranial direct current stimulation both combined with daily exercise therapy over 6 weeks. Transcranial direct current stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to worse pain for 20 min at 2 mA with a 30 s ramp up/down period. Recruitment, retention, and adherence were evaluated for feasibility. Safety was assessed through serious and minor adverse events and an adverse effect questionnaire. Clinical outcome measures assessed headache, pain, quality of life, and mood symptoms at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 6- and 12-weeks post-treatment.
Results: A total of 97 participants were contacted to participate with 32 recruited, 16 randomized into each group, and 14 completing the treatment protocol in both groups. Within each group 12 (active) and nine (sham) completed treatment within the proposed 6 weeks (three sessions per week), others received 18 sessions but took longer. Exercise therapy was completed on an average of 87% of days for both groups. Transcranial direct current stimulation was safe, with no serious adverse events and one minor adverse event in the active group. Itching was a more common post-intervention complaint in the active group (64% active vs. 43% sham). Exploratory analysis revealed significant group × time interactions for average headache pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.012, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.751 to -0.273; p = 0.008), 6-weeks (β = -1.370, 95% CI -2.109 to -0.631; p < 0.001), and 12-weeks (β = -1.842, 95% CI -2.600 to -1.085; p < 0.001) post-treatment, and for neck pain from pre- to post-treatment (β = -1.184, 95% CI -2.076 to -0.292; p = 0.010) and 12-weeks (β = -1.029, 95% CI -1.944 to -0.114; p = 0.028) post-treatment favoring active vs. sham. There were no significant group × time interactions for quality of life or mood.
Conclusion: The combination of transcranial direct stimulation and exercise therapy is safe and feasible for treating cervicogenic headache. While some promise has been shown for reducing headache and neck pain, larger scale trials with adequate power are needed to confirm these findings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.14887 | DOI Listing |
Headache
January 2025
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Objective: Our primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of cervicogenic headache. Our exploratory objectives compared symptoms of headache, mood, pain, and quality of life between active and sham transcranial direct stimulation combined with exercise therapy.
Background: Cervicogenic headache arises from injury to the cervical spine or degenerative diseases impacting cervical spine structure resulting in pain, reduced quality of life, and impaired function.
J Affect Disord
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Dummy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Psychopharmacol Neurosci
February 2025
Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
Auditory/visual hallucinations and perceptual anomalies are one of the core symptoms experienced by patients with schizophrenia. Studies have implicated lateral occipital cortex (LOC) as one of the areas to be aberrantly functioning in schizophrenia, possibly associated with the auditory/visual symptoms of schizophrenia. Here we report of a case of a 29-year-old female diagnosed with treatment resistant schizophrenia on clozapine with persistent auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) and visual anomalies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Individuals avoid spending cognitive effort unless expected rewards offset the perceived costs. Recent work employing tasks that provide explicit information about demands and incentives, suggests causal involvement of the Frontopolar Cortex (FPC) in effort-based decision-making. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we examined whether the FPC's role in motivating effort generalizes to sequential choice problems in which task demand and reward rates vary indirectly and as a function of experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed J Malaysia
January 2025
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential adjunct therapy for post-stroke motor rehabilitation. While conventional rehabilitation methods remain the primary approach to improving motor function after stroke, many patients experience incomplete recovery, necessitating the exploration of additional interventions. This commentary article examines the role of tDCS in poststroke motor recovery, focusing on its mechanisms, efficacy, and limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!