Estimating the impacts of calorie labels in fast-food settings using a novel comparison: Comparing California drive-through and in-store purchases.

Prior studies assessing the impact of calorie labels in fast-food settings have relied on comparisons across local and state jurisdictions with and without labeling mandates; several well-designed studies indicate a small reduction of calories purchased as a result of the labels. This study exploits a staggered roll-out of calorie labels in California to study the same issue using a novel comparison of in-store purchases with calorie information and drive-through purchases without calorie information at the same locations. With this design, consumers in both the treatment and comparison groups have been subject to the same social signals associated with the policy change and may have been exposed to calorie information during prior purchases, narrowing the intervention under study to the impact of posted menu labels at the point of purchase. Transactions (N = 201,418,976) at 424 unique restaurants at a single fast-food chain were included and a difference-in-differences design was used to examine changes one and two years after the implementation of labels at in-store counters compared to baseline. Using this comparison of consumer purchases within the same jurisdictions, we found no meaningful impact of posted calorie labels at the point of purchase, suggesting that such labels did not induce behavioral change. Additional methods to strengthen the impact of labeling policies are worthy of further study.