A systematic review of the effectiveness of leaded glasses for ensuring safety among healthcare professionals in fluoroscopy.

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci

Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, Coimbra 3046-854, Portugal. Electronic address:

Published: January 2025

Background: Currently, there is an increase in procedures across various clinical specialties involving the use of ionising radiation.

Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review is to analyse and compare the existing literature regarding the effectiveness of leaded glasses for healthcare professionals.

Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were conducted for relevant studies published between 2018 and 2023 using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology.

Results: After the complete text screening, 11 articles were deemed suitable for inclusion in the review. Leaded glasses significantly reduce eye radiation exposure, with studies showing shielding effects ranging from 10 % to 88,9 %, depending on the configuration and thickness of the glasses. For instance, lightweight glasses achieved a shielding effect of 61.4 %, while thicker lead equivalents (≥0.5 mm) offered up to ninefold dose reductions. Studies also noted the importance of lateral shielding and ergonomic designs for optimal protection. Leaded glasses significantly reduce eye lens doses but are most effective when combined with other protective measures. Factors such as head orientation, procedural complexity, and operator movement influence their performance. The findings underscore the need for standardised guidelines on protective eyewear use and further research under real-world clinical conditions.

Conclusion: It is essential to ensure the proper use of leaded glasses to minimize the risks of ionising radiation for healthcare professionals in fluoroscopy procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101848DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leaded glasses
20
systematic review
8
effectiveness leaded
8
healthcare professionals
8
professionals fluoroscopy
8
glasses reduce
8
reduce eye
8
glasses
7
leaded
5
review effectiveness
4

Similar Publications

A systematic review of the effectiveness of leaded glasses for ensuring safety among healthcare professionals in fluoroscopy.

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci

January 2025

Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Rua 5 de Outubro, S. Martinho do Bispo, Coimbra 3046-854, Portugal. Electronic address:

Background: Currently, there is an increase in procedures across various clinical specialties involving the use of ionising radiation.

Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review is to analyse and compare the existing literature regarding the effectiveness of leaded glasses for healthcare professionals.

Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were conducted for relevant studies published between 2018 and 2023 using the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radiation Protection in the Orthopedics Department: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.

Cureus

December 2024

Radiological Science Department, College of Applied Medical Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Objective: This study assesses radiation protection practices and knowledge among orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed orthopedic surgeons in Saudi Arabia using an online standardized and pre-tested questionnaire. The data were analyzed using statistical software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is increasingly common in orthopaedics, although recent guidelines have reduced the maximum recommended exposure to 20 mSv annually. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to comprehensively assess current adherence to exposure guidelines, identify practice settings at increased risk for exposure, and determine the best practices and personal protective equipment for ocular radiation risk mitigation.

Questions/purposes: In this systematic review we asked: (1) Is the annual amount of eye irradiation received by orthopaedic surgeons below the recommended limit of 20 mSv? (2) What is the effectiveness of leaded glasses in reducing the eye's exposure to radiation? (3) Which imaging setups and operative techniques reduce ocular irradiation?

Methods: PubMed, Medline, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar were queried on September 28, 2023, to identify studies assessing intraoperative ocular radiation exposure among orthopaedic surgeons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to assess radiation protection practices among endourologists in Europe, focusing on compliance with recommendations from the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) and measuring annual radiation exposure from 2017 to 2020.
  • - A survey of 10 endourologists revealed that while most use basic protective gear such as lead aprons and thyroid shields, advanced protections like leaded gloves and glasses are less common; additionally, the mean radiation exposure was below safety thresholds for the chest, eyes, and extremities.
  • - The findings indicated that endourologists effectively adhered to radiation safety standards, with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) protocol in place to further minimize exposure during procedures like per
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: in general, spine surgeons seek to minimize soft tissue damage by using less invasive approaches, which causes them to use intraoperative images much more frequently than other surgical specialties; therefore, they are at increased risk of radiation exposure.

Objective: the aim of this work was to analyse the amount of radiation to which the spine surgeon is exposed in different scenarios.

Material And Methods: a prospective study with a descriptive, longitudinal non-randomized data source.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!