Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is characterized by the proteolytic breakdown of the extracellular matrix, leading to dilatation of the aorta and increased risk of rupture. Biomarkers that can predict major adverse aortic events (MAAEs) are needed to risk stratify patients for more rigorous medical treatment and potential earlier surgical intervention.
Objectives: The primary objective was to identify the association between baseline levels of these biomarkers and MAAEs over a period of 5 years.
Methods: Baseline levels of 3 proteases (matrix metalloproteinases 7, 8, and 10) and 3 protease inhibitors (tissue factor pathway inhibitor [TFPI], SerpinA12, SerpinB3) were investigated. Plasma levels of these biomarkers were quantified in 134 patients with AAA and 134 matched controls. Patients were followed for a 5-year period during which MAAEs were documented. The association between these markers and MAAEs was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
Results: TFPI was significantly elevated in patients with AAA and significantly associated with MAAE during the 5-year period (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15-2.01; = .003) after adjusting for covariates. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that patients in the high TFPI group (defined as plasma levels >25.961 ng/mL) had significantly reduced freedom from the need for aortic repair and MAAEs.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that TFPI may serve as a valuable prognostic marker for the risk of MAAEs within 5 years in patients with AAA, potentially offering new tools for the medical management of patients with AAA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732669 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102645 | DOI Listing |
Res Pract Thromb Haemost
January 2025
Division of Vascular Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is characterized by the proteolytic breakdown of the extracellular matrix, leading to dilatation of the aorta and increased risk of rupture. Biomarkers that can predict major adverse aortic events (MAAEs) are needed to risk stratify patients for more rigorous medical treatment and potential earlier surgical intervention.
Objectives: The primary objective was to identify the association between baseline levels of these biomarkers and MAAEs over a period of 5 years.
J Immunother Precis Oncol
February 2025
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Introduction: Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and an unmet need for biomarkers. We performed a retrospective evaluation of real-world efficacy, safety outcomes, and baseline inflammatory biomarkers in patients with advanced pSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with advanced pSCC who received ICIs from 2012 to 2023 at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, GA.
EBioMedicine
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, CAMS Key Laboratory of Translational Research on Lung Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. Electronic address:
Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumour with a dismal prognosis. Currently, the identification of a specific tumour antigen that can facilitate immune-based therapies for SCLC remains elusive.
Methods: We employed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to analyse cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) in SCLC cell lines and human tumour specimens.
MethodsX
December 2024
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.
This paper provides a thorough analysis of recent advancements and emerging trends in the integration of metal additive manufacturing (AM) within orthopedic implant development. With an emphasis on the use of various metals and alloys, including titanium, cobalt-chromium, and nickel-titanium, the review looks at their characteristics and how they relate to the creation of various orthopedic implants, such as spinal implants, hip and knee replacements, and cranial-facial reconstructions. The study highlights how metal additive manufacturing (AM) can revolutionize the field by enabling customized implant designs that take patient anatomical variances into account.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Genet
December 2024
From the Division of Neurology (A.H.T., S.-Y.L.), Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (P.S.-A.), Clínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile; Departamento de Farmacologia (A.F.S.S.), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Serviço de Neurologia (A.F.S.S.), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil; Institute of Neurogenetics (H.M., M.L.D., C.K.), University of Lübeck, Germany; Department of Biomedical Science (A.A.-A.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (J.S., B.F.), New York; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics (C.E.W.), Indiana University, Indianapolis; Department of Neuroscience and Brain Health (M.L.D.), Metropolitan Medical Center, Manila, Philippines; Centre for Preventive Neurology (S.D., M.T.P., A.J.N.), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom; Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento (M.T.P.), Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Spain; Laboratory of Neurogenetics (M.B.M.), National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (M.B.M., H.R.M.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (R.N.A.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York; Movement Disorders Division (R.N.A.), Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; Molecular Medicine Laboratory and Neurology Department (K.R.K.), Concord Clinical School, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney; Translational Neurogenomics Group (K.R.K.), Genomic and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; and St Vincent's Healthcare Campus (K.R.K.), Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Background And Objectives: In the era of precision medicine, genetic test results have become increasingly relevant in the care of patients with Parkinson disease (PD). While large research consortia are performing widespread research genetic testing to accelerate discoveries, debate continues about whether, and to what extent, the results should be returned to patients. Ethically, it is imperative to keep participants informed, especially when findings are potentially actionable.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!