Objective: This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of implant prostheses and peri-implant bone among 6 different mandibular reconstruction models based on patient data involving the use of an upper free-end double-barrel fibula.

Methods: This study was an observational study. Five models were reconstructed using fibular-supported and implant-supported partial dentures. Two of these models were double-barrel fibula models with different gaps between the upper and lower segments. The other 2 were single-layered fibular models (the fibula was placed at the inferior or superior mandibular borders). The fifth model was a double-barrel fibula with a free distal end on the upper segment. In addition, a typical mandibular model was created for comparison. Two fixed partial-denture models were used in this study. The von Mises stress and strain of the models were analyzed.

Results: The maximum stress decreased with increasing gap between the upper and lower fibula. The distal free-end double-barrel fibula showed a potential to reduce the maximum stress around the implant apex while increasing it around the implant neck compared with a fixed distal-end double-barrel fibula.

Conclusions: Utilizing a free distal end on the upper fibula may be a viable option for mandibular reconstruction, especially when the fibula length is limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011068DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

double-barrel fibula
16
mandibular reconstruction
12
fibula
8
free-end double-barrel
8
upper lower
8
free distal
8
distal upper
8
maximum stress
8
models
7
upper
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!