Introduction In idiopathic scoliosis surgery, studies have shown two attending surgeons have better curve correction, pain, and recovery time. There is conflicting evidence on operative time, blood loss, infection rate, and hospital length of stay. Limited literature examines the impact of surgeon experience on the dual approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two young orthopedic attendings compared to a senior-level attending in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Methods We examined adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion by a single or dual-attending approach. We performed a 1:1 propensity score match with the variables of age at surgery, sex, body mass index, Cobb angle, and number of levels fused. Peri- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results There were 24 patients in each cohort. Patients having surgery by dual attendings had a shorter mean operative time overall (232 vs. 327 minutes, p<0.001) and per levels fused (19 vs. 26 minutes per level, p<0.001). Dual attendings had better percent curve correction (70% vs. 56%, p=0.001) and smaller overall final postoperative curve magnitude (17° vs. 25°, p<0.001). Estimated blood loss (421 vs. 989 mL, p=0.023) and cell saver volume transfused (59 vs. 178 mL, p<0.001) were lower in dual attending cases. Dual attending patients had a shorter length of stay (3 vs. 4 days, p<0.001). There were no differences in Hemovac blood loss, transfusion requirements, need for intensive care, or complications. Over time, the young dual attendings improved in hospital length of stay (R: -0.617, p=0.001) and hemovac blood loss (R: -0.474, p=0.019). Conclusion A dual attending approach in idiopathic scoliosis surgery may result in shorter operative time, greater curve correction, reduced operative blood loss, and shortened hospital length of stay. No differences were identified in postoperative blood loss or transfusion requirement, need for intensive care, or overall complication rate. Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that dual attending surgery in idiopathic scoliosis is safe and effective when conducted by two young orthopedic surgeons, with results that are similar to that of a more experienced senior surgeon.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731542 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75745 | DOI Listing |
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
January 2025
Scientific Institute, I.R.C.C.S. "E.Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Objective: Spinal orthoses are the most viable conservative treatment for scoliosis, and additive manufacturing techniques have shown huge perspective in producing patient-specific braces, reducing material waste, and production times. This pilot study aimed at determining whether 3D-printed braces could induce advantages or disadvantages compared to conventional braces in terms of mobility and gait, and at quantitatively evaluating the effects of braces on mobility and gait.
Methods: Ten participants were included in the study, eight with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and two with osteogenesis imperfecta.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, 200433, China.
With the emergence of numerous classifications, surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be guided more effectively. However, surgical decision-making and optimal strategies still lack standardization and personalized customization. Our study aims to devise proper deep learning (DL) models that incorporate key factors influencing surgical outcomes on the coronal plane in AIS patients to facilitate surgical decision-making and predict surgical results for AIS patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpine Deform
January 2025
Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Orthopedics, Lerdsin Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, 190 Silom Road, Bangkok, 10500, Thailand.
Study Design: A prospective comparative study.
Objectives: To compare the curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using supine traction push-prone and push-prone traction radiographs and to determine which method is more effective in predicting the postsurgical correction.
Background: Preserving spinal motion is one of the critical objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.
Spine Deform
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Purpose: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion surgical option for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) that requires a postoperative (PO) chest tube. This study evaluates whether 48 h of PO TXA reduces chest tube (CT) drainage and retention compared to 24 h of TXA following VBT for AIS.
Methods: Consecutively treated patients with a diagnosis of AIS who underwent VBT were assessed.
J Clin Med
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
: Surgery for adolescent idiopathic deformities is often aimed at improving aesthetic appearance, striving for the best possible correction. However, severe and rigid scoliotic curves not only present aesthetic issues but can also compromise cardiopulmonary health and cause early neurological impairment due to spinal cord compression, posing significant risks of morbidity and mortality if untreated. Conservative treatments are ineffective for severe curves, defined by scoliotic angles over 70° and flexibility below 30% on lateral bending X-rays.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!