Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity in the effect of calorie labeling on fast-food purchases among restaurants located in areas with different neighborhood characteristics.
Methods: In a quasi-experimental design, using transaction data from 2329 Taco Bell restaurants across the United States between 2008 and 2014, we estimated the relationships of census tract-level income, racial and ethnic composition, and urbanicity with the impacts of calorie labeling on calories purchased per transaction.
Results: Calorie labeling led to small, absolute reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups, ranging between -9.3 calories (95% CI: -18.7 to 0.0) and -37.6 calories (95% CI: -41.6 to -33.7) 2 years after labeling implementation. We observed the largest difference in the effect of calorie labeling between restaurants located in rural compared with those located in high-density urban census tracts 2 years after implementation, with the effect of calorie labeling being three times larger in urban areas.
Conclusions: Fast-food calorie labeling led to small reductions in calories purchased across all population subgroups except for rural census tracts, with some subgroups experiencing a greater benefit.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.24198 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!