Real-world implementation of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for continuous control of devices should ideally rely on fully asynchronous decoding approaches. That is, the decoding algorithm should continuously update its output by estimating the user's intended actions from real-time neural activity, without the need for any temporal alignment to an external cue. This kind of open-ended temporal flexibility is necessary to achieve naturalistic and intuitive control, but presents a challenge: how do we know when it is appropriate to decode anything at all? Activity in motor cortex is dynamic and modulates with many different types of actions (proximal arm control, hand control, speech, etc.), which can interfere with each other. Additionally, the "decodability" of any given action type (amount of relevant information present in the neural activity) fluctuates over time based on motor intent as well as intrinsic network dynamics. Here we present a method for simplifying the problem of continual decoding that uses transient, end effector-specific neural responses to identify periods of effector engagement. For example, we have observed unique neural signatures at the onset and offset of hand-related actions. Only after detecting the period of engagement do we then decode specific action features (e.g. digit movement or force). By using this gated approach, decoding models can be simpler (owing to local linearities) and are less sensitive to interference from cross-effector interference such as combined reaching and grasping actions. Clinical Trial ID: NCT01894802.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adaa1f | DOI Listing |
J Neural Eng
January 2025
University of Pittsburgh, 1622 Locust St, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, UNITED STATES.
Real-world implementation of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for continuous control of devices should ideally rely on fully asynchronous decoding approaches. That is, the decoding algorithm should continuously update its output by estimating the user's intended actions from real-time neural activity, without the need for any temporal alignment to an external cue. This kind of open-ended temporal flexibility is necessary to achieve naturalistic and intuitive control, but presents a challenge: how do we know when it is appropriate to decode anything at all? Activity in motor cortex is dynamic and modulates with many different types of actions (proximal arm control, hand control, speech, etc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVision Res
October 2020
Cognitive Science Program, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address:
Perceived duration can be subject to deviations around the time of a voluntary action. Whether the mechanisms underlying action-induced visual duration effects are effector-specific or require a more generalized action-linked multimodal calibration with the transient visual system, however, is a question yet to be answered. Here, we investigate this using dynamic visual stimuli presented as contingent upon the execution of an arbitrarily associated voluntary manual response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLife Sci
May 2016
Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33101-6189, USA. Electronic address:
Gαq signals with phospholipase C-β (PLC-β) to modify behavior in response to an agonist-bound GPCR. While the fundamental steps which prime Gαq to interact with PLC-β have been identified, questions remain concerning signal strength with PLC-β and other effectors. Gαq is generally viewed to function as a simple ON and OFF switch for its effector, dependent on the binding of GTP or GDP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Brain Res
November 2003
Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Evidence has been reported favoring the view of a dual mode of space representation for action and spatial cognition. While the dorsal system seems to be mainly involved in direct coding of space for action by means of several effector-specific representations, the ventral system appears to be responsible for more enduring and conscious representations underlying spatial cognition and awareness. In accordance with this view are recent studies documenting dissociations between exploratory and goal-directed movements in patients with brain damage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!