Background: Migraine affects up to 40% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of antibodies (mAbs) against CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) with disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for MS (mAb and non-mAbs) and their impact on MS disease course.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentric study included PwMS from 14 MS Centers, treated with an anti-CGRP mAb and a stable treatment with DMTs. MS outcome measures included clinical relapses, EDSS score, and MRI activity from the year before starting anti-CGRP mAbs at the time of initiation (baseline) and last follow-up. Migraine outcomes included reductions in Monthly Headache Days (MHDs) and analgesic use. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results: Twenty-five patients were included (mean age of 39.4 ± 9.7 years). Nine PwMS (36.0%) were treated with non-mAb DMTs and 16 (64.0%) with mAb DMTs. During the concurrent treatment, six patients (24.0%) stopped anti-CGRP mAbs after 12.7 ± 11.6 months due to ineffectiveness (n = 3) migraine sustained improvement (n = 2) and AEs (n = 1). MHDs significantly decreased from baseline (22.0 ± 8.2) to the last follow-up (11.5 ± 13.7) (p = 0.002). EDSS score did not significantly change from the year before initiating anti-CGRP mAb (1.9 ± 1.4) to baseline (1.9 ± 1.4) and last follow-up (1.9 ± 1.5)(p = 0.497). Two patients (8.0%) had a clinical relapse, and one (4.0%) had MRI activity during treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs. Overall, DMTs were discontinued in two patients (8%). Mild AEs were reported in 2 PwMS (8.0%), none leading to discontinuation.

Conclusions: Long-term treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs and DMTs for MS showed safety and effectiveness with no significant effect on MS disease course.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2025.123392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-cgrp mabs
20
effectiveness safety
8
multiple sclerosis
8
anti-cgrp
8
anti-cgrp mab
8
edss score
8
mri activity
8
treatment anti-cgrp
8
mabs dmts
8
mabs
6

Similar Publications

Effectiveness, safety, and impact on multiple sclerosis course of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.

J Neurol Sci

January 2025

Multiple Sclerosis Center, Binaghi Hospital, ASL Cagliari, Italy; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Italy.

Background: Migraine affects up to 40% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of antibodies (mAbs) against CGRP (anti-CGRP mAbs) with disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for MS (mAb and non-mAbs) and their impact on MS disease course.

Methods: This retrospective, multicentric study included PwMS from 14 MS Centers, treated with an anti-CGRP mAb and a stable treatment with DMTs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) offer effective migraine-specific preventive treatment. However, concerns exist about their potential cardiovascular risks due to CGRP blockade.

Objective: To compare the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Medicare beneficiaries with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP-mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA in the US.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective Switching from one anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAb) to another can be beneficial for treating patients with migraine who do not respond well to the first CGRP mAb. However, detailed and long-term follow-up reports of both efficacy and safety remain insufficient. We conducted a case-series analysis of patients with migraine who switched from galcanezumab to erenumab, both belonging to the class of CGRP mAbs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Migraine is associated with cervical artery dissection (CeAD). Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a multifunctional neuropeptide with vasodilatory effects. The use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAb) may affect cerebrovascular disease risk; however, no reports have associated CGRP mAb with CeAD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of first switching between monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor in the treatment of migraine.

Background: Although mAbs targeting CGRP or its receptor have emerged as a leading treatment for migraine prevention, a proportion of patients do not respond. While switching between these antibodies is a common clinical practice in such cases, the effectiveness remains a subject of study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!