Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with coexisting portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor patient outcomes. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC with PVTT remain a subject of debate. In the present study, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), with complication rates as a secondary outcome. A total of six studies comprising 750 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The neoadjuvant therapy group exhibited significantly superior OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; P<0.001] and RFS (HR, 0.31; P<0.001) compared with the primary hepatectomy control group. Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.34; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 0.24; P=0.004). While the neoadjuvant intervention subgroup exhibited an improved OS compared with controls (HR, 0.37; P=0.001), no significant difference in RFS was observed (HR, 0.11; P=0.095). Geographical analysis revealed that the Chinese subgroup demonstrated a significantly improved OS and RFS (HR, 0.41 for both; P<0.001), compared with the control group. However, the Japanese and Korean subgroups showed no improvement in OS (HR, 0.25; P=0.057) compared with the control group, and the results did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood transfusion, blood loss, operation time, bile leakage, ascites, peritoneal infection, postoperative bleeding, complications or mortality (all P>0.05). Overall, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT without increasing complication rates, supporting its efficacy and manageable safety profile.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726279 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2025.14868 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Timing of Surgery and Postoperative Outcomes in Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study in North India.
J Gastrointest Cancer
January 2025
MM Medical College Sadopur, Haryana, India.
Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the usual approach to manage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The optimal interval to operate after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) still remains controversial.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted to observe and compare postoperative complications and pathological outcomes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who underwent NACRT followed by surgery within 8 weeks or after 8 weeks of NACRT completion.
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy After Chemotherapy and the Optimal Interval from Radiotherapy to Surgery for Borderline Resectable and Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Background: Benefits of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer with major vessel invasion has been demonstrated through randomized controlled trials; however, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy remains controversial, especially for radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and the optimal time interval to undergo surgery after radiotherapy in (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer.
Methods: Between 2013 and 2022, patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer with vessel contact who received 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan or gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as initial treatment following surgery were included.
Correlation Between Grade of Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer and Oncologic Outcomes in the Era of Watch-and-Wait.
Dis Colon Rectum
November 2024
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Background: The watch-and-wait strategy provides an opportunity to pursue non-operative management in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The management of those with near complete response remains controversial.
Objective: We assessed the oncologic outcomes of patients managed by watch-and-wait versus total mesorectal excision according to clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Association between Deficient MSH2/MSH6 vs MLH1/PMS2 Status and Survival Rates in Localized Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Ann Surg
January 2025
Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Objective: This study investigated the association between loss of MSH2/MSH6 versus loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression and overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with localized colorectal cancer.
Background: The risk of developing colorectal cancer varies depending on the expression of mismatch repair proteins. However, it is unknown if the prognosis differs accordingly.
Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Kidney Autotransplantation: A Case Report.
Clin Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare malignancies, with retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) constituting 10%-15% of all STSs. RPS often presents late due to minimal early symptoms, typically requiring complete en-bloc resection for optimal survival outcomes. Achieving radical resection can be challenging due to the tumor's proximity to vital organs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!