Introduction: A diagnosis of melanoma in situ presents negligible risk to a person's lifespan or physical well-being, but existing terminology makes it difficult for patients to distinguish these from higher risk invasive melanomas. This study aims to explore whether using an alternative label for melanoma in situ may influence patients' management choices and anxiety levels.

Methods And Analysis: This study is a between-subjects randomised online experiment, using hypothetical scenarios. Following consent, eligible participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to three labels: 'melanoma in situ' (control), 'low-risk melanocytic neoplasm' (intervention 1) and 'low-risk melanocytic neoplasm, in situ' (intervention 2). The required sample size is 1668 people. The co-primary outcomes are (1) choice between no further surgery or further surgery to ensure clear histological margins greater than 5 mm and (2) choice between patient-initiated clinical follow-up when needed (patient-led surveillance) and regular routinely scheduled clinical follow-up (clinician-led surveillance). Secondary outcomes include diagnosis anxiety, perceived risk of invasive melanoma and of dying from melanoma and management choice anxiety (after surgery choice and follow-up choice). We will make pairwise comparisons across the three diagnostic label groups using regression models (univariable and multivariable).

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000740594). Ethics approval has been received from The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/HE000019). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, and a plain language summary of the findings will be shared on the Wiser Healthcare publication page (https://www.wiserhealthcare.org.au/category/publications/).

Trial Registration Number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID 386943).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667480PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089558DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

melanoma situ
12
management choices
8
risk invasive
8
'low-risk melanocytic
8
clinical follow-up
8
australian zealand
8
zealand clinical
8
clinical trials
8
trials registry
8
melanoma
5

Similar Publications

When Are Single Reader Evaluations Insufficient in Teledermoscopic Assessments? Analyses of a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Telemed J E Health

January 2025

Department of Clinical Sciences, Dermatology and Venereology, Lund Skin Cancer Research Group, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Teledermoscopy (TDS) emerges as an efficient tool for diagnosing skin lesions. In Sweden, double reading is the standard of care, but risk factors for misdiagnosis or mismanagement using single reader evaluations (SRE) are not well-studied. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of SRE compared with the gold standard in TDS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tissue specimens taken from primary tumors or metastases contain important information for diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients. Multiplex imaging allows visualization of heterogeneous cell populations, such as immune cells, in tissue samples. Most image processing pipelines first segment cell boundaries and then measure marker expression to assign cell phenotypes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Chronic inflammation in the tumour microenvironment (TME) via Th2-polarisation promotes melanoma progression and metastasis, making it a target for immunotherapy. Interleukin (IL)-4 is considered essential for Th2-polarisation in the TME; however, its source remains unknown. Basophils have been postulated as one of its sources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) are the most prevalent subtypes of melanoma, primarily affecting sun-exposed areas of the face in individuals aged 65 to 80 years. LM accounts for approximately 80 % of in situ melanomas and carries a risk of progression to LMM, which constitutes 4 % to 15 % of global cutaneous melanoma cases. This report discusses the clinical challenges and management strategies for recurrent LM, with an emphasis on accurate diagnosis and surgical intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Concurrent Viewing of H&E and Multiplex Immunohistochemistry in Clinical Specimens.

Diagnostics (Basel)

January 2025

Roche Diagnostics Solutions (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), 1910 E. Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ 85755, USA.

Performing hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on the same specimen slide provides advantages that include specimen conservation and the ability to combine the H&E context with biomarker expression at the individual cell level. We previously used invisible deposited chromogens and dual-camera imaging, including monochrome and color cameras, to implement simultaneous H&E and IHC. Using this approach, conventional H&E staining could be simultaneously viewed in color on a computer monitor alongside a monochrome video of the invisible IHC staining, while manually scanning the specimen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!