The comparison of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for esophageal cancer: a propensity-weighted analysis.

Objectives: The utilization of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become prevalent, notwithstanding, there are few studies exploring its application specifically in esophagectomy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data collected from patients diagnosed with clinical stage T1-3/N0/M0 thoracic esophageal cancer, who underwent surgery between January 2017 and December 2020. To evaluate the outcomes, an analysis was conducted utilizing the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

Results: This study identified 55 patients who underwent uniportal VATS and 212 patients who underwent multiportal VATS. Postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grades 1-2 occurred less frequently after uniportal than multiportal VATS in both unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted analyses (10.1% versus 28.8%, respectively; P = 0.018). Upon IPTW analysis, it indicated that the rate of pneumonia (grades 1-2) in the uniportal VATS group was 7.3%, notably lower than the corresponding rate of 23.2% observed in the multiportal VATS group (P = 0.037). Patients in uniportal VATS group had a shorter postoperative length of stay comparing with those in multiportal VATS group (9 versus 10 days, P = 0.006 after IPTW). The visual analog scale (VAS) was administered within 7 days following surgery and scores were significantly lower in uniportal VATS group (P < 0.001). No surgery-related mortality was observed in uniportal VATS group. The survival benefit observed between two groups was comparable before (P = 0.320) and after IPTW analysis (P = 0.824), indicating no significant difference.

Conclusions: The utilization of uniportal VATS for esophagectomy demonstrated a reduced occurrence of postoperative complications, accompanied by mitigated postoperative pain, thereby presenting as a viable and practical approach for treating esophageal cancer patients.