Background And Objectives: Timely access to specialist care is crucial in expeditious diagnosis and treatment. Our study aimed to assess the time patients wait from being referred by a physician to seeing a neurologist using Medicare data. Specifically, we evaluated differences in access related to sex, race/ethnicity, geography, and availability of neurologists.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using a 2018-2019 Medicare sample of patients who had a new patient visit to a neurologist. Our primary outcome was the wait time between their last visit with the referring physician and their first visit with the neurologist (the index neurologist visit). We also looked at the time between the first visit for a neurologic condition and the index neurologist visit for that same condition. We used a linear mixed-effects model to identify the factors associated with the wait time, considering the patients' hospital referral regions (HRRs).

Results: We identified 163,313 Medicare beneficiaries who had a new patient visit with a neurologist in 2018-2019 after their physician referred them. Their average age was 73.8 (SD 10.7). The median (interquartile range) wait time to the index neurologist visit was 34 days (15-70), and 18% of patients waited >90 days. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) had to wait an average of 29.4 days longer, patients with epilepsy waited 10.4 days longer, and patients with Parkinson disease (PD) waited 9.3 days longer than patients with back pain. There were no significant differences in wait times across race/ethnicity and sex. Our study also showed no significant differences in wait times across regions with varying levels of neurologist availability. When patients visited a neurologist located outside of their residential or referring physician's HRR, the wait time was extended by an average of 11 days.

Discussion: We found that, patients waited 34 days to see a neurologist after their physician referred them while 18% of them waited more than 90 days. Factors such as sex, race/ethnicity, and neurologist availability did not significantly affect timely access to neurologists. Patients with MS, epilepsy, and PD had longer wait times, despite needing the specialized care that neurologists can provide. This highlights the need for innovative approaches to improve timely access to neurologists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wait time
20
neurologist
12
timely access
12
visit neurologist
12
neurologist visit
12
days longer
12
longer patients
12
waited days
12
wait times
12
wait
10

Similar Publications

Larotrectinib is a highly selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor with efficacy in children with TRK fusion tumors. We evaluated patient outcomes after elective discontinuation of larotrectinib in the absence of disease progression in a protocol-defined wait-and-see subset analysis of eligible patients where treatment resumption with larotrectinib was allowed if disease progressed. We also assessed the safety and efficacy of larotrectinib in all pediatric patients with sarcoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Internalizing and externalizing psychiatric disorders among children are common and debilitating, affecting family interactions, learning and peer relations. The aim of the present quasi-randomised pilot-study was to investigate preliminary effects of a mentalization-based time-limited treatment (MBT-C) for children with mixed psychiatric disorders. The trial comprised 17 children, aged 4-11 with mixed disorders, and their parents, admitted to an outpatient psychotherapy clinic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Impact of Surgery Delay on Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer.

Life (Basel)

January 2025

1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "Papageorgiou" Hospital, 564 29 Thessaloniki, Greece.

(1) Background: Suspicious adnexal masses should be referred to gynecological oncology units. However, when surgery waiting lists are prolonged, these patients usually suffer from a delay in surgery. This could have a negative impact on their prognosis when the final diagnosis is ovarian cancer (OC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The objective of this paper is to explore how an emergency department in Argentina collected patient experience perspectives using varied tools to inform improvement activities. A case report of a mixed-methods assessment of patient experiences to inform quality improvement in an Emergency Department in Argentina. This study was conducted from July 2022 to December 2023 at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The third most prevalent gynecological cancer globally, following cervical and uterine cancer, and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. The time ovarian cancer patients have to wait between diagnosis and initiation of treatment are the indicators of quality in cancer care and influence patient outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!