Introduction: Patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with femur fracture is extremely painful and various methods have been tried to reduce mobilisation pain.
Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine, ketamine and femoral nerve block in patients posted for fractured femur for alleviating the positional pain before spinal anaesthesia.
Materials And Methods: A total of 75 patients (25 per group) of American Society of Anaesthetists Grade I-III patients of age group 18-80 years with fractured femur scheduled for elective surgery. All patients in Group C (n = 25) were given the femoral nerve block, Group D (n = 25) were given intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg and Group K (n = 25) were given intravenous ketamine 0.3mg/kg. The parameters assessed were quantitative relief of pain by a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction score, quality of patient positioning and time to perform spinal anaesthesia along with hemodynamics and sedation score.
Results: The pain scores and patient satisfaction scores were significantly decreased in all three groups but were much significantly lower in Group K.
Conclusion: Ketamine was found to be superior to the other two groups in terms of reducing positional pain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17504589231224559 | DOI Listing |
Drug Des Devel Ther
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on the ED and ED of sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.
Patients And Methods: Parturients who underwent elective cesarean section (n = 80) were randomly assigned to either the sufentanil group (S group) or the dexmedetomidine-sufentanil combination group (DS group). Patients in the S group received a combination of sufentanil, 5 mg of tropisetron, and saline, whereas patients in the DS group were administered 1.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Introduction: Sedation ensures a child remains motionless during a procedure and decreases anxiety. Several pharmacologic regimes exist for paediatric sedation. However, often, intravenous cannulation is required, causing distress for the child.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Perioper Pract
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Introduction: Patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with femur fracture is extremely painful and various methods have been tried to reduce mobilisation pain.
Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine, ketamine and femoral nerve block in patients posted for fractured femur for alleviating the positional pain before spinal anaesthesia.
Materials And Methods: A total of 75 patients (25 per group) of American Society of Anaesthetists Grade I-III patients of age group 18-80 years with fractured femur scheduled for elective surgery.
J Anesth
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.58, Zhongshan 2Nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Purpose: Perioperative respiratory adverse event (PRAE) is one of the most common complications in pediatric anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative pharmacological interventions to prevent the development of PRAE in children undergoing noncardiac surgery.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.
Neurol Res
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia Management, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine administration in the management of sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE).
Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 165 patients diagnosed with SAE, who were categorized into two groups: the lidocaine group ( = 55) and the control group ( = 110). The lidocaine group received an intravenous injection of lidocaine at 1.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!