AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to develop an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) model for elderly lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery, involving 200 participants split into an ERAS group and a control group.
  • Results showed the ERAS group had significantly lower postoperative pulmonary complications (8% vs. 18%), shorter duration of chest tube placement (2.57 days vs. 3.92 days), and reduced pain scores (2.14 vs. 3.78) compared to the control group.
  • The ERAS model not only minimizes complications and pain but also helps maintain lung function in elderly lung cancer patients, suggesting it should be widely adopted.

Article Abstract

Objective: To explore a model suitable for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for elderly patients with lung cancer in this region.

Methods: A total of 200 elderly patients with lung cancer who were admitted to our department and received thoracoscopic surgery from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were enrolled as observation subjects and were randomly assigned to an ERAS group (100 cases) and a control group (100 cases). All patients were aware of and agreed to enter the study, and the protocols were approved by the hospital ethics committee (2021 Medical Ethics Review 26). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, duration of postoperative chest tube, postoperative pain, and pulmonary function (including forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)) on postoperative day 7 were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly lower in the ERAS group (8.00%) than in the control group (18.00%). The incidence of postoperative atelectasis in the ERAS group (2%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (10%). The duration of postoperative chest tube in the ERAS group (2.57 ± 0.72 days) was significantly shorter than that in the control group (3.92 ± 1.54 days). The postoperative pain score of the ERAS group (2.14 ± 0.86) was significantly lower than that of the control group (3.78 ± 1.15). On postoperative day 7, both FVC and FEV1 in the ERAS group were significantly better than those in the control group. SPSS 20 was used for statistical analysis, and the < .05 was considered clinically significant.

Conclusion: The ERAS model established in our department can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, relieve postoperative pain, and better protect the lung function of elderly patients with lung cancer. The model is worth promoting because it enhances recovery after surgery and reduces the family burden of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723335PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2024.00037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eras group
24
control group
24
elderly patients
16
patients lung
16
lung cancer
16
incidence postoperative
16
recovery surgery
12
group
12
postoperative pain
12
postoperative
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!