COVID-19 pandemic restrictions necessitated curricular modifications in Canadian occupational therapy education. Documentation and reflection on temporary or permanent curriculum modifications and their perceived impact on student learning and outcomes is critical. To explore and compare reported curricula changes (academic and fieldwork) during restricted and post-restricted delivery periods together with the perceived impact on learners. A cross-sectional online descriptive survey was sent to key representatives from administration, curriculum, and fieldwork at all 14 accredited occupational therapy university programs in Canada. Overall, many pandemic-restricted curricula delivery and assessment changes shifted back toward pre-pandemic methods. Changes that were maintained were congruent with universal design or perceived limited adverse impact on learning. Both in-person and virtual learning were perceived as important for changing practice needs. Fieldwork placement recruitment remained a challenge, with some programs increasing the use of simulation. Interpersonal competency development and assessment method integrity were more visible and of concern. Interpersonal competency development and assessment method integrity were more visible and of concern. Programs demonstrated remarkable flexibility to shift, adapt, and deliver curricula, but the human cost for this accomplishment is still palpable.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00084174241310076 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!