Aim: Cemiplimab has demonstrated significantly longer survival than physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. We report the final survival analysis from the phase III randomized study (EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9).
Methods: Cemiplimab (n = 304) or chemotherapy (n = 304) were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were included regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status.
Results: At a median follow-up of 47.3 months (data cut-off: April 20, 2023), median OS was 11.7 versus 8.5 months for patients treated with cemiplimab and chemotherapy, respectively (hazard ratio 0.67, 95 % confidence interval 0.56-0.80, p < .00001). OS benefit was seen in PD-L1 positive and negative populations, even though more patients with PD-L1 < 1 % (n = 92), had poor performance status in the cemiplimab arm than the chemotherapy arm (61.4 % vs 47.9 %).
Conclusion: This final analysis confirms that cemiplimab maintains survival benefit compared with chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer after progression on first-line platinum therapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression. The safety profile was consistent with published data; incidences of adverse events were similar between cemiplimab and chemotherapy groups. These results support the use of second-line cemiplimab for patients with recurrent cervical cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115146 | DOI Listing |
J Control Release
January 2025
Precision Medicine in Oncology (PrMiO), and Nanomedicine Innovation Center Erasmus (NICE), Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address:
The recent approval of pembrolizumab in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer warrants further investigations into the usefulness of immunotherapies for more durable and less radical interventions. In this study, the targeting potential of anti-PD-L1-functionalized immunoliposomes was tested in a 3D in vitro cervical cancer-on-a-chip model. Immunolipsomes were synthesized and decorated externally with monovalent anti-PD-L1 Fab' fragments of commercially available atezolizumab.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed
January 2025
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Although there is anti-tumor efficacy of dual CTLA-4/PD-1 blockade in advanced/recurrent cervical cancer, it is unclear whether combination with chemotherapy is synergistic. In COMPASSION-16, Wu et al. demonstrated improved survival outcomes of cadolinimab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for first-line systemic therapy for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer, suggesting a potential role of bispecific CTLA-4/PD-1 inhibitors in the frontline setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Cancer
January 2025
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aim: Cemiplimab has demonstrated significantly longer survival than physician's choice of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. We report the final survival analysis from the phase III randomized study (EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9).
Methods: Cemiplimab (n = 304) or chemotherapy (n = 304) were administered every 3 weeks.
Gynecol Oncol
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA. Electronic address:
Objective: The optimal treatment for patients with cervical stromal invasion (CSI) in endometrial cancer (EC) remains unclear. We aimed to test the prognostic role of molecular classification in EC patients with CSI.
Methods: A retrospective, multicenter review of EC patients with CSI was performed.
Surgery
January 2025
Department of Surgery, The NYU Grossman School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health, New York, NY. Electronic address:
Background: To improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a complete resection is crucial. However, evidence regarding the impact of microscopically positive surgical margins (R1) on recurrence is conflicting due to varying definitions and limited populations of patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of the resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stratified by local tumor stage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!