Obtaining informed consent in vulnerable populations like children and adolescents, is a relevant issue and raises ethical concerns. Minors are considered unable to consent to treatment, and permission from guardians is required for them. Nevertheless, several studies have been carried out on the competence of pediatric patients, with mixed results. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed to assess children and adolescents' decisional capacity to consent to treatment. The search strategy identified 2,790 studies, including 10 that survived full-text screening and evaluation. Studies included in the analysis evaluated the decision-making capacity of minors using the MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool - Treatment (MacCAT-T), the Adolescent Psychiatric Patient Competency Questionnaire (CQ-ChP); the Measure of Competency (MOC), the Measure of Competency- Hypothetical (MOCHyp). Overall, minors over the age of 13 showed an acceptable decisional capacity. However, further research, preferably on larger groups, is needed to shed more light on this topic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116343DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

decisional capacity
12
consent treatment
12
capacity consent
8
children adolescents
8
systematic review
8
consent
4
treatment
4
treatment children
4
adolescents systematic
4
review obtaining
4

Similar Publications

Background: Previous reports suggest patient and caregiver lack of awareness of dementia. Little is known about how this varies by ethnicity and how informal (family) caregiver burden is associated with knowing a dementia diagnosis.

Objective: To investigate whether participants with probable dementia were aware of a diagnosis provided by a physician and how this differed among Mexican American and non-Hispanic White participants; whether having a primary care physician was associated with dementia diagnosis unawareness; and the association of dementia diagnosis unawareness with caregiver burden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This article will review the historical underpinnings of informed consent and decisional capacity, current practices, and potential evolving future modifications or elaborations of decision-making practices in clinical settings.

Method: Ethical and legal foundations for informed consent for health care are reviewed. Contemporary issues with decision making, clinical capacity, and proxy decision making in rehabilitation psychology practice are discussed with a specific focus on health care decision making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Obtaining informed consent in vulnerable populations like children and adolescents, is a relevant issue and raises ethical concerns. Minors are considered unable to consent to treatment, and permission from guardians is required for them. Nevertheless, several studies have been carried out on the competence of pediatric patients, with mixed results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Eating disorders are severe conditions that require weight restoration and psychotherapy, but many patients often refuse treatment, raising concerns about their ability to make decisions regarding their care.
  • A study involving 45 women at a psychiatric unit in Rome assessed various psychiatric symptoms and decision-making capacity, revealing that 67% of participants exhibited low decision-making capacity, with even higher rates among those with Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa.
  • Specific psychological symptoms can either impair or enhance a patient's ability to make informed decisions, indicating that clinicians should carefully evaluate their patients' decision-making capacity to provide appropriate support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!