Prognostic significance of three lymph node staging systems in pancreatic cancer with ≤ 12 and > 12 retrieved lymph nodes.

Updates Surg

Department of General Surgery, Department of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Da Hua Road, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the predictive effectiveness of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients based on the number of retrieved lymph nodes.
  • All three nodal staging systems were found to independently predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), with improved survival linked to higher NLN, lower LNR, and lower N stage.
  • LNR outperformed N stage in predicting prognosis, while NLN had limited effectiveness, particularly in predicting survival for patients with stage N0 disease.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with ≤ 12 retrieved lymph nodes and those with > 12 retrieved lymph nodes. Moreover, the association between the three nodal staging systems and survival was also explored. Clinical data on patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2020 were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Survival probability was calculated and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of each nodal staging system. All three lymph node staging systems were independent predictors of CSS and OS. A higher NLN, a lower N stage, and a lower LNR were associated with improved survival. Compared with N stage, LNR staging performed better with a lower AIC and higher C-index for predicting the prognosis regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes, while NLN staging performed poorly in both the training and validation set. Subgroup analyses showed that the NLN successfully predicted survival outcomes in both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients. LNR demonstrated better predictive performance in PDAC patients regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes. Notably, for stage N0 disease, NLN was a more important prognostic predictor. The combination of LNR and NLN may offer more precise information on lymph node staging than the current staging system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02075-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lymph nodes
24
retrieved lymph
20
lymph node
16
node staging
12
staging systems
12
lymph
11
three lymph
8
staging
8
predictive performance
8
nodes nln
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!