The electrification of the transport sector is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the reliance on fossil fuels. Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) depend on critical materials (CMs) for their batteries and electronic components, yet their widespread adoption may face constraints due to the limited availability of CMs. This study assesses the implications of vehicle electrification and lightweighting (material substitution) on the U.S. CM demand for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (MHDVs). Market sales scenarios of 100% internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), 100% BEVs, and a 50%/50% mix are considered. The findings reveal that LDVs dominate the total CM demand despite MHDVs requiring more CMs per vehicle. Cobalt, graphite, lithium, neodymium, and nickel are critical for the 100% BEV adoption scenario, whereas palladium and rhodium are critical for ICEVs. LDV lightweighting increases total CM quantity per vehicle due to steel replacement with aluminum but reduces the vehicle's mass, operational energy consumption, and reliance on high-concern battery-related CMs. Transitioning from nickel manganese cobalt (NMC622) to lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery chemistry reduces CM use but increases demand for strategic materials such as copper and phosphorus. This study uniquely evaluates U.S. CM demand for LDVs and MHDVs across conventional and electric powertrains and investigates light-weighting and battery chemistry impacts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08395DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vehicle electrification
8
electrification lightweighting
8
critical materials
8
battery chemistry
8
demand
5
impact on-road
4
vehicle
4
on-road vehicle
4
critical
4
lightweighting critical
4

Similar Publications

This work examines the impact of the electrification of the Holon-Bat Yam passenger train line (central Israel) on air pollutant concentrations using data collected from air quality monitoring stations that operated at the train stations across the electrified train line. We present statistically significant reduction in the annual average NO, NO and NO concentrations (29-45%, 79-85% and 65-75%, respectively), attributed to the electrification of the passenger train line. The drop in the NO and NO concentrations was much stronger than in the NO concentrations, since NO is the main nitrogen species emitted by diesel locomotives.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Local Climate Might Amplify Economic and Environmental Impacts of Electric Vehicles in China.

Environ Sci Technol

January 2025

Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Electric vehicles (EVs) are crucial for addressing the intertwined challenges of climate change and air pollution. The multiaspect benefits of EVs are highly dependent on local climate conditions, yet the impacts of regional heterogeneity in the context of future climate change remain unclear. Here, we develop a systemic modeling framework integrating fleet modeling, emission projection, index decomposition analysis, and detailed cost assessment to identify local drivers and potential trade-offs behind electrification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The use of transportation network companies (TNCs), such as Uber and Lyft, is widespread in many US cities, including those with good transit. However, transit use produces smaller externalities relative to private vehicles and is cheaper but can increase travel time. Here we compare the benefits and costs of real TNC trips in Chicago to a counterfactual in which they are performed by transit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Emerging Trends and Future Opportunities for Battery Recycling.

ACS Energy Lett

January 2025

George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.

The global lithium-ion battery recycling capacity needs to increase by a factor of 50 in the next decade to meet the projected adoption of electric vehicles. During this expansion of recycling capacity, it is unclear which technologies are most appropriate to reduce costs and environmental impacts. Here, we describe the current and future recycling capacity situation and summarize methods for quantifying costs and environmental impacts of battery recycling methods with a focus on cathode active materials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Marginal Abatement Costs of CO of Co-Optima Multi-Mode Vehicles.

Energy Fuels

January 2025

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, Washington 99354, United States.

The Co-Optimization of Fuels and Engines (Co-Optima) is a research and development consortia funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, which has engaged partners from national laboratories, universities, and industry to conduct multidisciplinary research at the intersection of biofuels and combustion sciences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!