Aims: In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has an accelerated pathway to prioritize approval of medicines. Approved drugs are then assessed by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies before being made available to patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristics of the drugs admitted to the EMA accelerated assessment (AA) and scrutinize the downstream HTA procedures regarding these medicines and the final assessment regarding added therapeutic value (ATV).

Methods: Regulatory publicly available documents were scrutinized for all medicines authorized by the EMA between 2019 and 2021 to create a regulatory database. A second database was created by extracting data of the medicines that had requested the EMA accelerated pathway from three national HTA bodies (AIFA, HAS and G-BA).

Results: Standard assessments by the EMA had a median of 364 days while AAs were significantly shorter (189 days). Only 12 out of 164 authorized medicines were assessed in this manner. Small chemical entities had a significantly lower chance of being assessed under the AA, while biological and PRIME scheme medicines had a higher chance; AA had a higher chance of leading to authorizations under exceptional circumstances. These 12 products were assessed more quickly compared to other products by HTA bodies, although this did not always lead to decisions of major ATV over alternatives.

Conclusions: A minority of medicinal products are assessed under the accelerated pathway. HTA bodies also assess these products more quickly, but do not always perceive an important clinical advantage over alternatives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16385DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hta bodies
16
ema accelerated
12
accelerated pathway
12
accelerated assessment
8
medicines
8
european medicines
8
medicines agency
8
higher chance
8
products assessed
8
ema
5

Similar Publications

Aims: In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has an accelerated pathway to prioritize approval of medicines. Approved drugs are then assessed by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies before being made available to patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the characteristics of the drugs admitted to the EMA accelerated assessment (AA) and scrutinize the downstream HTA procedures regarding these medicines and the final assessment regarding added therapeutic value (ATV).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Guidance for an Effective Approach to Integrated Evidence Planning in a Dynamic World.

Clin Pharmacol Ther

January 2025

Boston Consulting Group, Zurich, Switzerland.

The value of a medicine is defined by its impact on patients, caregivers, health system, and society. A pharmaceutical company will generate evidence to demonstrate this value in various studies, including randomized clinical trials, non-interventional and observational studies, real-world data analyses, modeling, and simulation. The quality and strength of the evidence supporting a medicine's effectiveness, safety and product quality will drive decisions by healthcare system stakeholders for marketing authorization (regulatory authorities).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the region of Tuscany in Italy, since 2019, medical devices belonging to risk classes 2b, 3, or active implantable have been managed by a multidisciplinary health-technology assessment body initially composed of eight members and extended to 23 members in 2022, thus creating the Centro Operativo. In 2021, an original algorithm for the identification of innovative devices based on objective criteria was developed and formally recognized over the following years. However, since these criteria identified only a small number of innovative devices, we tried to develop another algorithm aimed at identifying a new classification (called "potentially innovative device"), which was intended to be intermediate between full innovation and no innovation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the impact of a parallel regulatory and reimbursement process on (1) direction of funding decisions, 2) time-lag until funding recommendation, and (3) type of evidence submitted, for cancer medicines.

Methods: Public regulatory and reimbursement decision documents were reviewed for cancer medicines considered by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) since the introduction of parallel processing. Medicine-indication pairs were identified from these documents and data extracted on the type and quality of evidence submitted, funding decisions and timelines, by type of review process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Europe has undergone significant evolution, culminating in the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2021/2282 on HTA (HTAR) aimed at fostering sustainable collaboration in HTA at the European Union (EU) level. The EUnetHTA 21 project, a 2-year initiative, was commissioned to address key methodological issues and prepare for the implementation of the HTAR. This commentary documents the outcomes of the EUnetHTA 21 project, focusing on Joint Clinical Assessments (JCAs), while analyzing challenges encountered and lessons learned for future collaboration under the HTAR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!