The Impairment Argument's Coup de Grâce.

Bioethics

Department of Philosophy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Published: January 2025

According to Hendricks Impairment Argument (IA), abortion is immoral because it impairs the fetus. Here, I argue it is not sufficient to show merely that abortion impairs, Hendricks must show that it harms the fetus. If the fetus is not numerically identical to the person it will become, then it isn't harmed by an abortion. But if the fetus is numerically identical to the person it will become, it is harmed by the deprivation of a future of value. However, taking this route ultimately undermines the novelty of the impairment argument.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13394DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impairment argument
8
fetus numerically
8
numerically identical
8
identical person
8
person will
8
will harmed
8
impairment argument's
4
argument's coup
4
coup grâce
4
grâce hendricks
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!