The Impairment Argument's Coup de Grâce.

Bioethics

Department of Philosophy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Published: January 2025

According to Hendricks Impairment Argument (IA), abortion is immoral because it impairs the fetus. Here, I argue it is not sufficient to show merely that abortion impairs, Hendricks must show that it harms the fetus. If the fetus is not numerically identical to the person it will become, then it isn't harmed by an abortion. But if the fetus is numerically identical to the person it will become, it is harmed by the deprivation of a future of value. However, taking this route ultimately undermines the novelty of the impairment argument.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13394DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impairment argument
8
fetus numerically
8
numerically identical
8
identical person
8
person will
8
will harmed
8
impairment argument's
4
argument's coup
4
coup grâce
4
grâce hendricks
4

Similar Publications

The Impairment Argument's Coup de Grâce.

Bioethics

January 2025

Department of Philosophy, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

According to Hendricks Impairment Argument (IA), abortion is immoral because it impairs the fetus. Here, I argue it is not sufficient to show merely that abortion impairs, Hendricks must show that it harms the fetus. If the fetus is not numerically identical to the person it will become, then it isn't harmed by an abortion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Abnormalities in body perception in patients affected by anorexia nervosa have been widely studied, but without explicit reference to their relationship to others and the social processes involved. Yet, there are a several arguments supporting impairments in interpersonal relationships in these patients. Notably, some evidence suggests that self/other distinction (SOD), the ability to distinguish one's own body, actions and mental representations from those of others could be impaired.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Reasoning involves drawing conclusions from information, with two main types: deductive (drawing specific conclusions from general principles) and inductive (generalizing from specific instances).
  • Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that different brain areas, specifically the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), are used for these reasoning types, but results have been inconsistent.
  • This study utilized high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on these brain areas to assess their roles in reasoning, finding that IFG stimulation can impair deductive reasoning tasks, while DLPFC stimulation improves performance on challenging inductive reasoning tasks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tipping Point: Pathogenic Stress and the Biopolitics of Euthanasia.

Linacre Q

October 2024

Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Hopelessness and demoralization following a terminal diagnosis can affect the capacity for self-governance. Such dispositions can increase the allostatic load-the cumulative burden of stress and anxiety-resulting in a neurophysiologic decline that can impair autonomy and influence the desire to end one's life deliberately. An allostatic overload is characterized by the inability to autoregulate stress and is associated with pathological changes to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and hippocampus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects approximately .25%-3% of children, and if left untreated, can cause significant impairment for the child and family. Cognitive behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention (ERP) is the gold-standard treatment for pediatric OCD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!