Objectives: One important aspect in facilitating language access for children with hearing loss (HL) is the auditory environment. An optimal auditory environment is characterized by high signal to noise ratios (SNRs), low background noise levels, and low reverberation times. In this study, the authors describe the auditory environment of early intervention groups specifically equipped for young children with HL.
Design: Seven early intervention groups for children with HL were included in the study. A total of 26 young children (22 to 46 months) visiting those groups participated. Language Environmental Analysis recorders were used to record all sounds around a child during one group visit. The recordings were analyzed to estimate SNR levels and background noise levels during the intervention groups. The unoccupied noise levels and reverberation times were measured in the unoccupied room either directly before or after the group visit.
Results: The average SNR encountered by the children in the intervention groups was +13 dB SNR. The detected speech of the attending professionals achieved the +15 dB SNR recommended by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association in approximately 42% of the time. The unoccupied noise levels were between 29 and 39 dBA, complying with acoustic norms for classroom environments (≤35 dBA, by ANSI/ASA 12.60-2010 Part 1) for six out of seven groups. Reverberation time was between 0.3 and 0.6 sec for all groups, which complies to the acoustic norms for classroom environments for children without HL (0.6 or 0.7 sec, depending on the room size), while only one group complied to the stricter norm for children with HL (0.3 sec).
Conclusions: The current findings show characteristics of the auditory environment of a setting that is specifically equipped and designed for groups of children with HL. Maintaining favorable SNRs seems to be the largest challenge to achieve within the constraints of an environment where young children gather, play, and learn. The results underscore the importance of staying attentive to keep spoken language accessible for children with HL in a group setting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001627 | DOI Listing |
Ear Hear
January 2025
Dutch Foundation of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child (NSDSK), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Objectives: One important aspect in facilitating language access for children with hearing loss (HL) is the auditory environment. An optimal auditory environment is characterized by high signal to noise ratios (SNRs), low background noise levels, and low reverberation times. In this study, the authors describe the auditory environment of early intervention groups specifically equipped for young children with HL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNoise Health
January 2025
Department of Public Health, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey, USA.
Background/objectives: Noise remains an under-discussed type of environmental pollutant, which exerts a wide range of adverse health effects, both auditory and non-auditory. Ensuring that the public has ready access to useful health information online about noise exposure is important. In this regard, evaluating the content of public news articles regarding noise pollution is vital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) in children is a growing public health concern due to increased exposure to high noise levels in various environments. Early intervention is crucial to prevent long-term developmental and social impacts. This study evaluates the effectiveness of earmuffs as a protective intervention in managing NIHL in children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNoise Health
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Background: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience difficulties in understanding speech in noise despite having normal hearing.
Aim: This study aimed to determine the relationship between speech discrimination in noise (SDN) and medial olivocochlear reflex levels and to compare MS patients with a control group.
Material And Methods: Sixty participants with normal hearing, comprising 30 MS patients and 30 healthy controls, were included.
Noise Health
January 2025
K M Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth deemed to be University, Waghodia, Vadodara - 391760, India.
Background: Noise sources in paediatric dental offices include machinery and children's cries and screams. Although the presence of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) among dental operators is established, preventive measures such as ear protection devices (EPDs) are not frequently employed as prophylactic intervention. The primary aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the noise levels in paediatric dental clinics and to qualitatively evaluate the operators' perception of noise with and without the use of EPDs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!