Systematic review of integrated mental and physical health services for children and young people with eating and functional symptoms.

Background: Evidence suggests that by recognising the psychosocial component of illness as equally important to the biological components, care becomes more holistic, and patients can benefit. Providing this type of care requires collaboration among health professionals, rather than working in isolation, to achieve better outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence about the implementation of integrated health care. This review focuses on children and young people experiencing eating disorders (i.e. disorders related to feeding and eating) or functional symptom disorders (i.e. medically unexplained symptoms).

Aims: The present review is part of a larger study that will inform the development of a new children's hospital in England. Both eating disorders and functional symptom disorders are conditions that may be particularly likely to benefit from an integrated approach to health care, and this review aims to investigate what service models have been used to integrate care, what factors influence their implementation, and what effects these integrated models have on access to and outcomes from care.

Method: We conducted a systematic review of studies based on children and young people with eating disorders or functional symptom disorders, investigating the effectiveness of integrated mental and physical health services versus any other type of services provided in these populations. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycInfo® (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA) electronic bibliographic databases in July 2024 without restriction on the date of publication or country of interest. We reviewed only studies written in English.

Results: We identified 2668 citations which resulted in 1939 papers eligible for title screening. Only one single-site Australian evaluation of an integrated care model from over 20 years ago was included in our review. The study reported significantly higher number of total admissions and total bed-days utilised in the integrated approach. However, the burden of care shifted from psychiatric wards to medical wards and as a result, the cost per admission and the cost per inpatient decreased.

Limitations: The lack of conceptual consistency about the definition of integrated care may have driven false screening and loss of some evidence. The same limitation applies in terms of the definition of functional symptom disorders.

Conclusions: The review identified a gap in the evidence base relating to integrated secondary service provision for children and adolescents with eating disorders or functional symptom disorders in comparison with generic services. No similar studies were identified for children and young people with functional symptom disorders. Our findings align with previous evidence and show that despite the existence of studies describing aspects of integrated care, integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders or functional symptom disorders is underexplored and the limited available evidence is of weak quality.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR133613.