Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance. Among factors related to biosecurity, mortality rate <2% within one week of age, survival rate >98%, and production index >350 in farms in which: bedding was not reused or only reused once, regular advice and biosecurity training was provided by poultry veterinarians, distinctions between clean and dirty areas were strictly enforced at all times, workers used farm biosecurity manuals, or disinfection guidelines were fully implemented, including cleaning before introducing new flocks and daily disinfection throughout growth, were significantly higher than those in farms without these measures ( < 0.05). The absence of biosecurity practices increased antimicrobial use to one (25.7%), two (39.2%), and three (25.7%) times ( < 0.05). In farms that implemented biosecurity practices, the antimicrobial administration was significantly increased to two times (44.2%) ( < 0.05), with only 17.4% of farms using antimicrobials three times. The prevalence of environmental resistant to multiple cephalosporins and chloramphenicol, which are not used on broiler farms, was significantly reduced by biosecurity practices ( < 0.05). Our findings indicate that improved biosecurity practices decrease antimicrobial use, decrease the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and help to eliminate resistant bacteria in farm environments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700789 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.2025001 | DOI Listing |
J Poult Sci
January 2025
College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41556, Republic of Korea.
Farm biosecurity is valuable for reducing the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. However, its relationship with antimicrobial usage can be difficult to assess because of multiple factors. This study evaluated the impact of biosecurity practices on productivity, frequency of antimicrobial use, and development of antimicrobial resistance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Association of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
In Bangladesh, farming serves as a key livelihood, leading to a higher risk of zoonotic diseases due to frequent animal interactions and traditional practices. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of livestock farmers regarding zoonotic disease outbreaks. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 658 livestock farmers from randomly selected regions in Bangladesh from April to June 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract
January 2025
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.
Respiratory disease in cattle and small ruminants is caused by various factors, including inadequate biosecurity and biocontainment. Biosecurity and biocontainment depend on good husbandry. Testing on arrival and quarantining for 42 to 56 days could improve biosecurity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFViruses
December 2024
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
This study evaluated influenza A virus (IAV) detection and genetic diversity over time, specifically at the human-swine interface in breeding and nursery farms. Active surveillance was performed monthly in five swine farms in the Midwest United States targeting the employees, the prewean piglets at sow farms, and the same cohort of piglets in downstream nurseries. In addition, information was collected at enrollment for each employee and farm to assess production management practices, IAV vaccination status, diagnostic procedures, and biosecurity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Environ Res Public Health
November 2024
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences (DiAAA), University of Molise, Via Francesco de Sanctis snc, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Regulation (EU) 2016/429 introduces comprehensive guidelines for managing transmissible animal diseases, including zoonoses. The subsequent Commission Implementing Regulation 2018/1882 categorizes these diseases into five groups, each with specific responses, ranging from mandatory eradication to optional eradication or surveillance. Key regulatory priorities include enhanced animal traceability, biosecurity, wildlife pathogen control, sustainable farming practices, and minimizing the impact of diseases on public health, animal health, and the environment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!